Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

pillpack.com

PillPack - Pharmacy Simplified

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

699 ms

Page Rendered

853 ms

pillpack.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pillpack.com now to see the best up-to-date Pill Pack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pillpack.com

We’re a full-service online pharmacy that packages your medication and delivers to your door every month.

Visit pillpack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pillpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pillpack.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pillpack.com

11 ms

www.pillpack.com

99 ms

8508268791.js

65 ms

scrolljack-polyfills-74927a6ddc.js

11 ms

modernizr-94426477e0.min.js

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Pillpack.com, 16% (5 requests) were made to Type.pillpack.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.optimizely.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (343 ms) relates to the external source Type.pillpack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 158.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

4.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Pillpack.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 134.2 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pill Pack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 29.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (20%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pill Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pillpack.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pillpack.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pillpack.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pillpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pillpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pill Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: