Tools & Wizards About Us
pilotexpedition.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

pilotexpedition.com

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

561 ms in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

458 ms

Page Rendered

69 ms

pilotexpedition.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pilotexpedition.com homepage info - get ready to check Pilotexpedition best content right away, or after learning these important things about pilotexpedition.com

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit pilotexpedition.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pilotexpedition.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 527 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pilotexpedition.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pilotexpedition.com

34 ms

91 ms

s9A9umuN3q5.css

15 ms

NlIg59n83AV.css

18 ms

7TXvrmQm8c5.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pilotexpedition.com, 67% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (2 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (91 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.2 kB (61%)

Content Size

87.1 kB

After Optimization

33.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Pilotexpedition.com main page is 87.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 83.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 53.2 kB

  • Original 83.2 kB
  • After minification 83.2 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pilotexpedition images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pilotexpedition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pilotexpedition.com

pilotexpedition.com

34 ms

91 ms

s9A9umuN3q5.css

s9A9umuN3q5.css

15 ms

NlIg59n83AV.css

NlIg59n83AV.css

18 ms

7TXvrmQm8c5.js

7TXvrmQm8c5.js

25 ms

szSrDf3yAfN.js

szSrDf3yAfN.js

10 ms

-7SoqkOoiBI.js

-7SoqkOoiBI.js

11 ms

css;base64,

css;base64,

2 ms

css;%20charset=utf-8;base64,

css;%20charset=utf-8;base64,

2 ms

o4gjb2QTWOc.js

o4gjb2QTWOc.js

15 ms

R8ZTLxqI2uK.js

R8ZTLxqI2uK.js

15 ms

uxkR2CEYmJq.png

uxkR2CEYmJq.png

15 ms

4lCu2zih0ca.svg

4lCu2zih0ca.svg

17 ms

O7nelmd9XSI.png

O7nelmd9XSI.png

18 ms

hsts-pixel.gif

hsts-pixel.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

pilotexpedition.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pilotexpedition.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

pilotexpedition.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pilotexpedition.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pilotexpedition.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pilotexpedition.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pilotexpedition. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: