Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

pine64.org

PINE64

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

726 ms

pine64.org screenshot

About Website

Visit pine64.org now to see the best up-to-date PINE64 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pine64.org

Visit pine64.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Pine64.org page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pine64.org performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.217

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pine64.org

12 ms

pine64.com

326 ms

css

25 ms

styles.css

156 ms

popup.css

311 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pine64.org, 59% (34 requests) were made to Pine64.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (580 ms) relates to the external source Pine64.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 823.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Pine64.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 51.8 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PINE64 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 299.3 kB

  • Original 460.5 kB
  • After minification 455.0 kB
  • After compression 161.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 299.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 480.1 kB

  • Original 575.4 kB
  • After minification 499.3 kB
  • After compression 95.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pine64.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 480.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (71%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PINE64. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pine64.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pine64.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pine64.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pine64.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pine64.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PINE64. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: