Tools & Wizards About Us
pipedoc.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

pipedoc.net

24-hour Plumbing & Heating Services | Repairs, Maintenance, Emergencies

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

555 ms

pipedoc.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pipedoc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pipedoc.net

Through honest answers and meticulous job performance, Pipe Doctor Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning delivers cost-effective and long-term solutions.

Visit pipedoc.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pipedoc.net page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pipedoc.net performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pipedoc.net

64 ms

www.pipedoc.net

1047 ms

gtm.js

78 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

50 ms

5b61cc772a2de372b6d2e43be97da201.css

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Pipedoc.net, 13% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Pipedoc.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 130.1 kB (31%)

Content Size

425.3 kB

After Optimization

295.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pipedoc.net main page is 425.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 234.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 126.7 kB

  • Original 153.8 kB
  • After minification 137.3 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 937 B

  • Original 234.0 kB
  • After minification 233.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pipedoc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 12.7 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipedoc.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (67%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pipedoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pipedoc.net

pipedoc.net

64 ms

www.pipedoc.net

www.pipedoc.net

1047 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

50 ms

5b61cc772a2de372b6d2e43be97da201.css

5b61cc772a2de372b6d2e43be97da201.css

120 ms

7b0337aba69f2600dbabb80a108388a9.js

7b0337aba69f2600dbabb80a108388a9.js

119 ms

css2

css2

67 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

119 ms

js

js

200 ms

overrides.css

overrides.css

62 ms

all.css

all.css

69 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

50 ms

script.js

script.js

185 ms

proChat.js

proChat.js

218 ms

c6db8ea0442a25b90fa522ab77908160.js

c6db8ea0442a25b90fa522ab77908160.js

50 ms

main_c2ffc3c7.js

main_c2ffc3c7.js

182 ms

abb2d09e0a6b88e7c342754fa2008516.js

abb2d09e0a6b88e7c342754fa2008516.js

182 ms

js

js

288 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

288 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

261 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

192 ms

Pipe-Doctor-Home-Services-Inc-1-1.png

Pipe-Doctor-Home-Services-Inc-1-1.png

68 ms

bathroom-fixture.jpg

bathroom-fixture.jpg

69 ms

wifi.jpg

wifi.jpg

69 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

185 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

184 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

115 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

151 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

151 ms

fa-brands-400_fb481cb3.woff

fa-brands-400_fb481cb3.woff

185 ms

155 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

Accessibility Review

pipedoc.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

pipedoc.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pipedoc.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipedoc.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pipedoc.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pipedoc.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pipedoc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: