Access piper.de. Piper Verlag

37

Performance

Renders faster than
56% of other websites
82

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 52% of websites
83

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
55% of websites
93

SEO

Google-friendlier than
83% of websites

First Response

322 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Visit piper.de now to see the best up-to-date Piper content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about piper.de

Bücher und Infos zu AutorInnen und Veranstaltungen unserer Verlage. PIPER. So vielseitig wie unsere Leser.

Visit piper.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Piper.de page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

piper.de

322 ms

www.piper.de

888 ms

style.css

343 ms

loader.js

34 ms

uc-block.bundle.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Piper.de, 4% (4 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu and 3% (3 requests) were made to Api.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Piper.de.

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Piper.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 125.1 kB

Original 147.7 kB
After minification 120.2 kB
After compression 22.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 43.6 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Piper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 248 B

Original 293.7 kB
After minification 293.7 kB
After compression 293.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Piper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

DE
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Piper.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Piper.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

piper.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Piper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Piper Verlag

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)