Tools & Wizards About Us
piperslanding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

piperslanding.com

Piper's Landing Yacht & Country Club Home Page

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

piperslanding.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to piperslanding.com homepage info - get ready to check Piper S Landing best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about piperslanding.com

Visit piperslanding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Piperslanding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

piperslanding.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

piperslanding.com

96 ms

www.piperslanding.com

184 ms

www.piperslanding.com

465 ms

js

101 ms

jquery.min.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Piperslanding.com, 24% (17 requests) were made to Cdn.memfirstweb.net and 13% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (556 ms) belongs to the original domain Piperslanding.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 913.3 kB (13%)

Content Size

6.9 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Piperslanding.com main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 39.7 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 819.6 kB

  • Original 6.6 MB
  • After minification 5.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Piper S Landing needs image optimization as it can save up to 819.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 96.8 kB
  • After minification 96.8 kB
  • After compression 83.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 46.9 kB

  • Original 150.6 kB
  • After minification 150.6 kB
  • After compression 103.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Piperslanding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (55%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Piper S Landing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

piperslanding.com

piperslanding.com

96 ms

www.piperslanding.com

www.piperslanding.com

184 ms

www.piperslanding.com

www.piperslanding.com

465 ms

js

js

101 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

jquery-migrate-3.4.1.js

jquery-migrate-3.4.1.js

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

133 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.css

bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.css

64 ms

mrm_core.css

mrm_core.css

117 ms

memberside.js

memberside.js

72 ms

common_1.min.js

common_1.min.js

140 ms

global.v1.1.js

global.v1.1.js

116 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

74 ms

globalvars.asp

globalvars.asp

178 ms

lnu2mpu.css

lnu2mpu.css

116 ms

clean_weather_icons.css

clean_weather_icons.css

116 ms

global.v1.2.css

global.v1.2.css

127 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

127 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

139 ms

custom.js

custom.js

146 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

151 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

127 ms

slick.css

slick.css

138 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

139 ms

style.css

style.css

190 ms

common_javascript.js

common_javascript.js

190 ms

api.js

api.js

72 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

116 ms

api.js

api.js

92 ms

selectric.js

selectric.js

138 ms

selectric.css

selectric.css

148 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

61 ms

promise_polyfill.js

promise_polyfill.js

15 ms

p.css

p.css

45 ms

css

css

32 ms

logo.png

logo.png

157 ms

www.piperslanding.com

www.piperslanding.com

310 ms

fyf-image.png

fyf-image.png

187 ms

hp-overview1.jpg

hp-overview1.jpg

185 ms

hp-overview2.jpg

hp-overview2.jpg

153 ms

hp-overview3.jpg

hp-overview3.jpg

210 ms

hp-golf1.jpg

hp-golf1.jpg

239 ms

hp-realestate1.jpg

hp-realestate1.jpg

326 ms

marina-slide2.jpg

marina-slide2.jpg

359 ms

hp-clubhouse1.jpg

hp-clubhouse1.jpg

346 ms

hp-winningChef.jpg

hp-winningChef.jpg

361 ms

hp-racquetSports.jpg

hp-racquetSports.jpg

308 ms

hp-lifestyleCenter.jpg

hp-lifestyleCenter.jpg

341 ms

hp-marina.jpg

hp-marina.jpg

439 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

484 ms

dc-logo.png

dc-logo.png

384 ms

paper-bg.jpg

paper-bg.jpg

459 ms

button-bg-feat-hover.svg

button-bg-feat-hover.svg

343 ms

button-bg-feat.svg

button-bg-feat.svg

373 ms

button-bg-reg-hover.svg

button-bg-reg-hover.svg

387 ms

button-bg-reg.svg

button-bg-reg.svg

410 ms

footer-bg-2x.png

footer-bg-2x.png

556 ms

social-icon-bg.svg

social-icon-bg.svg

420 ms

d

d

104 ms

d

d

133 ms

d

d

260 ms

d

d

131 ms

blacksword.otf

blacksword.otf

479 ms

d

d

103 ms

d

d

104 ms

d

d

133 ms

d

d

104 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

132 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

107 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

101 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

129 ms

Accessibility Review

piperslanding.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

piperslanding.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

piperslanding.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Piperslanding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Piperslanding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

piperslanding.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Piper S Landing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: