3.7 sec in total
527 ms
2.6 sec
531 ms
Welcome to pipexpx.com homepage info - get ready to check Pipex Px best content right away, or after learning these important things about pipexpx.com
We design and manufacture weight saving and corrosion resistant solutions to suit project specific needs and requirements.
Visit pipexpx.comWe analyzed Pipexpx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 527 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pipexpx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value5,090 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value23.7 s
1/100
10%
527 ms
97 ms
55 ms
105 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Pipexpx.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source M3dia.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 469.0 kB (26%)
1.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Pipexpx.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 756.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pipex Px images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 321.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipexpx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 321.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (82%)
72
13
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pipex Px. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pipexltd.com
527 ms
gtm.js
97 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
55 ms
style.min.css
105 ms
styles.css
103 ms
settings.css
479 ms
ffwd_frontend.css
407 ms
fonts.css
102 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
404 ms
style.css
123 ms
base.css
125 ms
layout.css
719 ms
shortcodes.css
146 ms
animations.min.css
156 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
160 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
161 ms
responsive.css
165 ms
css
121 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
170 ms
custom.css
180 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
184 ms
jquery.min.js
195 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
191 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
208 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
209 ms
ffwd_cache.js
303 ms
ffwd_frontend.js
302 ms
jquery.mobile.js
304 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
304 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
305 ms
ffwd_gallery_box.js
755 ms
email-decode.min.js
303 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
304 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
305 ms
index.js
306 ms
core.min.js
305 ms
mouse.min.js
307 ms
sortable.min.js
317 ms
addthis_widget.js
152 ms
api.js
137 ms
js
157 ms
tabs.min.js
328 ms
accordion.min.js
293 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
plugins.js
266 ms
menu.js
282 ms
animations.min.js
300 ms
jplayer.min.js
806 ms
translate3d.js
290 ms
collect
29 ms
scripts.js
262 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
274 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
269 ms
custom.js
279 ms
index.js
275 ms
js
48 ms
home_creative2_zoombox_icon.png
1295 ms
NhbvfkMgCF8
172 ms
fXenrpSB2Do
337 ms
home_creative2_icon1.png
1291 ms
home_training_box_icon.png
1290 ms
NOV_CPS_FGS_Logo_Horz_RGB_F.png
74 ms
home-subsea-img.jpg
782 ms
MAN3.jpg
971 ms
Main-Whitecart-site.jpg
783 ms
blog_masonry_tile_gradient.png
390 ms
Main-Pipex-px-replacement-FRP-Parapets.jpg
90 ms
Main-0008_clair_ridge_installation_qu_modules1.jpg
116 ms
NOV-FGS-logo-white-1.png
146 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
47 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
47 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
94 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
95 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
95 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf
95 ms
mfn-icons.woff
901 ms
www-player.css
168 ms
www-embed-player.js
192 ms
base.js
257 ms
recaptcha__en.js
172 ms
ad_status.js
677 ms
UyQhPWNsNa0oRkd8oSQlA6PkpWpORMW0CLBRczdusu0.js
152 ms
embed.js
98 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
24 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
24 ms
pipexpx.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pipexpx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
pipexpx.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipexpx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pipexpx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pipexpx.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pipex Px. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: