3.2 sec in total
49 ms
2.8 sec
419 ms
Welcome to pipexpx.com homepage info - get ready to check Pipex Px best content right away, or after learning these important things about pipexpx.com
We design and manufacture weight saving and corrosion resistant solutions to suit project specific needs and requirements.
Visit pipexpx.comWe analyzed Pipexpx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pipexpx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value4,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
49 ms
559 ms
78 ms
27 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pipexpx.com, 65% (57 requests) were made to Pipexltd.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source M3dia.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 130.1 kB (9%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Pipexpx.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 742.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pipex Px images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipexpx.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (77%)
74
17
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pipex Px. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pipexpx.com
49 ms
pipexltd.com
559 ms
gtm.js
78 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
27 ms
style.min.css
38 ms
styles.css
32 ms
settings.css
72 ms
ffwd_frontend.css
33 ms
fonts.css
41 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
40 ms
style.css
42 ms
base.css
62 ms
layout.css
65 ms
shortcodes.css
73 ms
animations.min.css
69 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
80 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
82 ms
responsive.css
88 ms
css
44 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
81 ms
custom.css
83 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
82 ms
jquery.min.js
83 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
86 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
105 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
104 ms
ffwd_cache.js
104 ms
ffwd_frontend.js
118 ms
jquery.mobile.js
124 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
130 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
120 ms
ffwd_gallery_box.js
119 ms
email-decode.min.js
117 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
120 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
119 ms
index.js
118 ms
core.min.js
120 ms
mouse.min.js
156 ms
sortable.min.js
164 ms
addthis_widget.js
183 ms
api.js
68 ms
js
100 ms
tabs.min.js
164 ms
accordion.min.js
145 ms
plugins.js
138 ms
menu.js
135 ms
animations.min.js
131 ms
jplayer.min.js
181 ms
translate3d.js
147 ms
scripts.js
141 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
114 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
116 ms
custom.js
110 ms
index.js
147 ms
home_creative2_zoombox_icon.png
1995 ms
NhbvfkMgCF8
182 ms
fXenrpSB2Do
285 ms
home_creative2_icon1.png
1982 ms
home_training_box_icon.png
1981 ms
NOV_CPS_FGS_Logo_Horz_RGB_F.png
60 ms
home-subsea-img.jpg
59 ms
MAN3.jpg
61 ms
Main-Whitecart-site.jpg
69 ms
blog_masonry_tile_gradient.png
70 ms
Main-Pipex-px-replacement-FRP-Parapets.jpg
165 ms
Main-0008_clair_ridge_installation_qu_modules1.jpg
165 ms
NOV-FGS-logo-white-1.png
166 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
28 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
40 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
57 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
66 ms
www-player.css
105 ms
www-embed-player.js
124 ms
base.js
222 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
99 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf
100 ms
mfn-icons.woff
596 ms
recaptcha__en.js
115 ms
ad_status.js
410 ms
SdShMpdhHIYiz4OAK3X60VwAo5runEsW3RCnPxmRbSs.js
183 ms
embed.js
133 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
42 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
43 ms
id
89 ms
Create
116 ms
Create
163 ms
GenerateIT
17 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
pipexpx.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pipexpx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
pipexpx.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipexpx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pipexpx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pipexpx.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pipex Px. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: