Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

piristeel.fi

Piristeel – Sadevesi­järjestelmät ja kattoturva­tuotteet

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

piristeel.fi screenshot

About Website

Visit piristeel.fi now to see the best up-to-date Piristeel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about piristeel.fi

Suomen johtava sadevesijärjestelmien, tikkaiden ja kattoturvatuotteiden valmistaja. Tuotteita joiden kestävyys, turvallisuus ja toiminnallisuus on huippuluokkaa

Visit piristeel.fi

Key Findings

We analyzed Piristeel.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

piristeel.fi performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

piristeel.fi

1155 ms

gtm.js

73 ms

style.min.css

108 ms

styles.css

211 ms

all.min.css

412 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Piristeel.fi, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Piristeel.fi.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 487.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Piristeel.fi main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 130.1 kB

  • Original 148.5 kB
  • After minification 144.2 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Piristeel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 233.2 kB

  • Original 374.0 kB
  • After minification 374.0 kB
  • After compression 140.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 233.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 122.2 kB

  • Original 200.6 kB
  • After minification 200.4 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Piristeel.fi needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Piristeel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

piristeel.fi accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

piristeel.fi best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

piristeel.fi SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FI

  • Language Claimed

    FI

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Piristeel.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Piristeel.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Piristeel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: