2.8 sec in total
1 sec
1.5 sec
324 ms
Click here to check amazing Pitching content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pitching.top
Added good-luck piece are the corking restaurants hither, donation cursory dining, useful dining, dishes with regional fabricate and seafood, and skilful chefs
Visit pitching.topWe analyzed Pitching.top page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pitching.top performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
1006 ms
42 ms
81 ms
83 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Pitching.top, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Pitching.top.
Page size can be reduced by 206.5 kB (59%)
350.5 kB
144.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Pitching.top main page is 350.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 178.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pitching images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pitching.top needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (61%)
18
7
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pitching. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pitching.top
1006 ms
reset.css
42 ms
defaults.css
81 ms
style.css
83 ms
pagenavi-css.css
84 ms
jquery.js
173 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
94 ms
superfish.js
84 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
118 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
170 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
168 ms
wp-embed.min.js
168 ms
css
40 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
106 ms
hit
250 ms
background-menu-secondary.png
41 ms
background.jpg
131 ms
logo-1.png
42 ms
widgettitle-bg.png
40 ms
widget-list.png
41 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
20 ms
pitching.top accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
pitching.top best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pitching.top SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pitching.top can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Pitching.top main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pitching.top
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pitching. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: