Access pitchpipes.net. 澳门·3044永利集团-(China)有限公司

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value58.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.25

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

pitchpipes.net

383 ms

www.pitchpipes.net

2650 ms

beginning.css

5545 ms

public.css

8942 ms

swiper.css

8927 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Pitchpipes.net, 38% (25 requests) were made to Mylf888.com and 26% (17 requests) were made to Hdfzjt.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Hdfzjt.cn.

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Pitchpipes.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

Original 34.0 kB
After minification 26.7 kB
After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

Original 2.8 MB
After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pitchpipes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

Original 9.3 kB
After minification 8.7 kB
After compression 2.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 82 B

Original 505 B
After minification 505 B
After compression 423 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pitchpipes.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82 B or 16% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pitchpipes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

ZH
Language Claimed

ZH
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pitchpipes.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pitchpipes.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pitchpipes.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pitchpipes. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

澳门·3044永利集团-(China)有限公司

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

pitchpipes.net

www.pitchpipes.net

beginning.css

public.css

swiper.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

pitchpipes.net

www.pitchpipes.net

beginning.css

public.css

swiper.css

plyr.css

jquery.js

public.js

jquery.min.js

index.css

jquery.20.min.js

swiper.min.js

plyr.js

zhan.js

hm.js

21653055.js

banner1.avif

banner2.avif

banner3.avif

banner4.avif

banner5.avif

banner6.avif

logo.png

hm.gif

1-221124133Z6435.jpg

2-240202161943B3.jpeg

2-240102141214U1.jpeg

2-2310091552425a.jpeg

2-230912112Za23.jpeg

img11.jpg

img12.jpg

img13.jpg

img14.jpg

1-211020145500138.jpg

1-240F9164401641.jpg

1-240F916434LT.jpg

indexyl.html

zhongguomeng.js

index.css

jquery.la.min.js

yongli2021.gif

blakimg.jpg

1000x100.js.gif