Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

519 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

442 ms

pitermama.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit pitermama.ru now to see the best up-to-date Pitermama content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pitermama.ru

Форум для мам. В клубе для активных питерских мам на Pitermama.ru Вы узнаете все о материнстве и сами станете активным участником и автором.

Visit pitermama.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Pitermama.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pitermama.ru performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pitermama.ru

519 ms

bg.jpg

611 ms

logo_ny.jpg

781 ms

w7.gif

276 ms

cycounter

225 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Pitermama.ru, 37% (10 requests) were made to Doy.pitermama.ru and 7% (2 requests) were made to Counter.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Travel.pitermama.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Pitermama.ru main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 36.5 kB
  • After minification 36.0 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 51.2 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pitermama images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pitermama. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

pitermama.ru accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pitermama.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pitermama.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pitermama.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pitermama.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pitermama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: