1.7 sec in total
199 ms
1.1 sec
388 ms
Click here to check amazing Pivot Log content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pivotlog.net
Are you running a dynamic website or several of them? Then, you should try our Pivot tool to maintain your weblogs, online journals, or else.
Visit pivotlog.netWe analyzed Pivotlog.net page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
pivotlog.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
52/100
10%
199 ms
69 ms
147 ms
43 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Pivotlog.net, 9% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Pivotlog.net.
Page size can be reduced by 477.6 kB (68%)
699.1 kB
221.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Pivotlog.net main page is 699.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 371.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pivot Log images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 318.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pivotlog.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 318.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (72%)
29
8
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pivot Log. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pivotlog.net
199 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
style.css
147 ms
css
43 ms
font-awesome.min.css
123 ms
nivo-slider.css
135 ms
default.css
142 ms
bootstrap.min.css
224 ms
hover.min.css
160 ms
main.css
188 ms
jetpack.css
209 ms
jquery.js
271 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
219 ms
external.js
253 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
68 ms
wpgroho.js
254 ms
navigation.js
493 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
494 ms
custom.js
496 ms
wp-embed.min.js
497 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
cropped-header-smart-code-reference-tool2.jpg
169 ms
unnamed1-150x150.png
168 ms
icon-58188-150x150.png
222 ms
pampic_logo-150x150.png
128 ms
unnamed-150x150.png
129 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlEY6Fu39Tt9XkmtSosaMoEA.ttf
37 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGPS42wKzre0cxmO5m5GyTsY.ttf
62 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLlcMrNrsnL9dgADnXgYJjs.ttf
63 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
335 ms
hovercard.css
35 ms
services.css
54 ms
g.gif
6 ms
pivotlog.net accessibility score
pivotlog.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
pivotlog.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pivotlog.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pivotlog.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pivotlog.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pivot Log. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: