Tools & Wizards About Us
pixel-tech.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

pixel-tech.eu

PIXEL-TECH - Professional software for photographers

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

430 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

pixel-tech.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit pixel-tech.eu now to see the best up-to-date PIXEL TECH content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixel-tech.eu

We create software for Pro Photographers. As the Microsoft Partner we provide programming services for business. We specialize in Windows and mobile apps.

Visit pixel-tech.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixel-tech.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixel-tech.eu performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixel-tech.eu

430 ms

www.pixel-tech.eu

1568 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

217 ms

styles.css

306 ms

dcjq-mega-menu.css

328 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Pixel-tech.eu, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixel-tech.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (58%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixel-tech.eu main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.8 kB

  • Original 79.1 kB
  • After minification 77.3 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 52.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIXEL TECH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 453.7 kB

  • Original 652.1 kB
  • After minification 624.1 kB
  • After compression 198.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 453.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 159.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixel-tech.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (76%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIXEL TECH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pixel-tech.eu

pixel-tech.eu

430 ms

www.pixel-tech.eu

www.pixel-tech.eu

1568 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

217 ms

styles.css

styles.css

306 ms

dcjq-mega-menu.css

dcjq-mega-menu.css

328 ms

widgetize_menu_frontend_style.css

widgetize_menu_frontend_style.css

334 ms

advwidgets_styles.css

advwidgets_styles.css

344 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

52 ms

style.css

style.css

857 ms

style_custom.css

style_custom.css

541 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

398 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

413 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

424 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

832 ms

mpc-styles.css

mpc-styles.css

722 ms

style.css

style.css

578 ms

devices.min.css

devices.min.css

589 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

734 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

668 ms

jquery.dcmegamenu.1.3.4.min.js

jquery.dcmegamenu.1.3.4.min.js

678 ms

widgetize_menu_frontend_script.js

widgetize_menu_frontend_script.js

756 ms

main.parent.js

main.parent.js

846 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

809 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

822 ms

css

css

22 ms

css

css

20 ms

lnr.min.css

lnr.min.css

721 ms

eti.min.css

eti.min.css

897 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

923 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

923 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

992 ms

mpc-vendor.min.js

mpc-vendor.min.js

1026 ms

mpc-scripts.min.js

mpc-scripts.min.js

924 ms

main.js

main.js

923 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1114 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1114 ms

countUp.min.js

countUp.min.js

1136 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

153 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

419 ms

logo-retina.png

logo-retina.png

418 ms

Dokumenty-70x70.png

Dokumenty-70x70.png

418 ms

ILS-70x70.png

ILS-70x70.png

418 ms

admin-ajax_v3-70x70.png

admin-ajax_v3-70x70.png

418 ms

microsoft_partner.jpg

microsoft_partner.jpg

418 ms

8_poly-2.png

8_poly-2.png

564 ms

polygons_hero_2.jpg

polygons_hero_2.jpg

595 ms

www.pixel-tech.eu

www.pixel-tech.eu

1439 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

34 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

79 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

202 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

202 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

201 ms

lnr.ttf

lnr.ttf

403 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

403 ms

et-icons.woff

et-icons.woff

413 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

js

js

269 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

138 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

pixel-tech.eu accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pixel-tech.eu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pixel-tech.eu SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixel-tech.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixel-tech.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixel-tech.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PIXEL TECH. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: