Tools & Wizards About Us
pixel.co.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

pixel.co.com

گارانتی و خدمات پس از فروش پردازش گستر برتر فرداد خلیج فارس | گارانتی و خدمات پس از فروش شرکت پردازش گستر برتر فرداد خلیج فارس شامل محصولات ایسوس (asu...

Page Load Speed

14.1 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

12 sec

Page Rendered

535 ms

pixel.co.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pixel.co.com homepage info - get ready to check Pixel best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about pixel.co.com

گارانتی و خدمات پس از فروش شرکت پردازش گستر برتر فرداد خلیج فارس شامل محصولات ایسوس (asus) و لنوو (lenovo) و اپل (apple) و اچ پی (hp) و ایسر (acer) و سامسونگ (samsung) و ماکروسافت (microsoft) و کنسول ...

Visit pixel.co.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixel.co.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 12.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixel.co.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.pixel.co.com

1571 ms

l.js

208 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1134 ms

style.css

160 ms

style-rtl.min.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Pixel.co.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixel.co.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 936.5 kB (44%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixel.co.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 890.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 969.8 kB
  • After compression 114.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 890.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 916.6 kB
  • After minification 889.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 108.5 kB
  • After minification 108.5 kB
  • After compression 104.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 96.4 kB
  • After minification 96.4 kB
  • After compression 82.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixel.co.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (54%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.pixel.co.com

www.pixel.co.com

1571 ms

l.js

l.js

208 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1134 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

style-rtl.min.css

style-rtl.min.css

157 ms

styles.css

styles.css

2008 ms

styles-rtl.css

styles-rtl.css

105 ms

polls-css.css

polls-css.css

104 ms

polls-css-rtl.css

polls-css-rtl.css

153 ms

yasr.css

yasr.css

175 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

156 ms

yasr-table-light.css

yasr-table-light.css

1155 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

191 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

190 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

193 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

263 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

193 ms

quick-call-button.css

quick-call-button.css

264 ms

style.js

style.js

274 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

263 ms

polls-js.js

polls-js.js

266 ms

rater-js-rtl.js

rater-js-rtl.js

264 ms

yasr-front.js

yasr-front.js

267 ms

tippy.all.min.js

tippy.all.min.js

266 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

238 ms

drag-quick-call-button.js

drag-quick-call-button.js

237 ms

client.js

client.js

63 ms

client_legacy.css

client_legacy.css

117 ms

hotjar-1536815.js

hotjar-1536815.js

536 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1105 ms

header.png

header.png

2426 ms

title.svg

title.svg

1125 ms

cpu.png

cpu.png

855 ms

custom-rom-1-760x330.jpg

custom-rom-1-760x330.jpg

999 ms

Untitled-1-760x330.jpg

Untitled-1-760x330.jpg

1443 ms

siri-760x330.jpg

siri-760x330.jpg

1400 ms

deal-phone-760x330.jpg

deal-phone-760x330.jpg

2639 ms

iphone-part-number-1-365x365.jpg

iphone-part-number-1-365x365.jpg

2459 ms

apple.png

apple.png

1131 ms

samsung.png

samsung.png

1153 ms

acer.png

acer.png

1676 ms

msi.png

msi.png

2429 ms

microsoft.png

microsoft.png

2471 ms

lenovo.png

lenovo.png

2932 ms

asus.png

asus.png

3453 ms

sony.png

sony.png

3463 ms

hp.png

hp.png

2468 ms

maps.png

maps.png

4787 ms

modules.f0cd1ed70b545da08b60.js

modules.f0cd1ed70b545da08b60.js

272 ms

IRANSansWeb.woff

IRANSansWeb.woff

4301 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

142 ms

visit-data

visit-data

409 ms

SEO Factors

pixel.co.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixel.co.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pixel.co.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixel.co.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: