Tools & Wizards About Us
pixelconcept1.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

pixelconcept1.com

::. Pixelconcept .:: Agence de communication - Agadir

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

339 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

pixelconcept1.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pixelconcept1.com now to see the best up-to-date Pixelconcept 1 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixelconcept1.com

Pixel concept est une agence de communication basée àAgadir (Maroc) Experte en Creation web , stratégie d’entreprise et evénementiel , elle s’adapte et s’investit pleinement dans chaque projet en prop...

Visit pixelconcept1.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixelconcept1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixelconcept1.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.303

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixelconcept1.com

339 ms

style.css

300 ms

icons.css

204 ms

animate.css

206 ms

responsive.css

203 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Pixelconcept1.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixelconcept1.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixelconcept1.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

  • Original 31.0 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 50.5 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixelconcept 1 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 254.8 kB
  • After minification 254.8 kB
  • After compression 244.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 49.3 kB
  • After minification 49.3 kB
  • After compression 44.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelconcept1.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixelconcept 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pixelconcept1.com

pixelconcept1.com

339 ms

style.css

style.css

300 ms

icons.css

icons.css

204 ms

animate.css

animate.css

206 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

203 ms

peter_river.css

peter_river.css

201 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

35 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

82 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

401 ms

theme20.js

theme20.js

310 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

308 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

398 ms

jquery.knob.js

jquery.knob.js

398 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

406 ms

gmap3.js

gmap3.js

501 ms

jquery.tweet.js

jquery.tweet.js

497 ms

custom.js

custom.js

499 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

895 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1528 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

581 ms

head.jpg

head.jpg

195 ms

logo.png

logo.png

205 ms

reflect.png

reflect.png

123 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

486 ms

s3.jpg

s3.jpg

483 ms

halieutis.jpg

halieutis.jpg

499 ms

erfoud2016-palmagro.jpg

erfoud2016-palmagro.jpg

582 ms

erfoud2016.jpg

erfoud2016.jpg

497 ms

ws19.jpg

ws19.jpg

582 ms

im1.jpg

im1.jpg

584 ms

meknes16.jpg

meknes16.jpg

599 ms

w13.jpg

w13.jpg

600 ms

b1.jpg

b1.jpg

651 ms

ws8.jpg

ws8.jpg

795 ms

ws20.jpg

ws20.jpg

682 ms

30.jpg

30.jpg

682 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

581 ms

Metrize-Icons.svg

Metrize-Icons.svg

679 ms

wEO_EBrOk8hQLDvIAF81VvoP.ttf

wEO_EBrOk8hQLDvIAF81VvoP.ttf

12 ms

6NUT8F6PJgbFWQn47_x7pOskyQ.ttf

6NUT8F6PJgbFWQn47_x7pOskyQ.ttf

19 ms

embed

embed

194 ms

js

js

29 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

4 ms

search.js

search.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

pixelconcept1.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pixelconcept1.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pixelconcept1.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelconcept1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Pixelconcept1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixelconcept1.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixelconcept 1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: