Tools & Wizards About Us
pixeldima.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

pixeldima.com

PixelDima | WordPress Themes and Plugins provided by PixelDima

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

pixeldima.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pixel Dima content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixeldima.com

Creative & Powerful WordPress Themes We build Pixel-perfect WordPress Themes & Plugins and much more, get everything you need to power your online business and design process Check out our WordPress T...

Visit pixeldima.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixeldima.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixeldima.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,870 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixeldima.com

1835 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

16 ms

frontend.css

26 ms

grid.css

61 ms

base.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Pixeldima.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Pixeldima.disqus.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixeldima.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 618.1 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

702.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixeldima.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 543.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 43.8 kB
  • After minification 42.6 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 543.6 kB
  • After minification 521.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixel Dima images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 182.9 kB

  • Original 294.0 kB
  • After minification 293.2 kB
  • After compression 111.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.9 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 377.9 kB

  • Original 439.4 kB
  • After minification 372.6 kB
  • After compression 61.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixeldima.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 377.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (49%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixel Dima. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pixeldima.com

pixeldima.com

1835 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

16 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

26 ms

grid.css

grid.css

61 ms

base.css

base.css

27 ms

layout.css

layout.css

14 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

30 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

26 ms

mediaelementplayer.css

mediaelementplayer.css

20 ms

enfold.css

enfold.css

40 ms

custom.css

custom.css

61 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

51 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

38 ms

avia-compat.js

avia-compat.js

55 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

52 ms

avia.js

avia.js

48 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

51 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

54 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

53 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

53 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

52 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

293 ms

ga.js

ga.js

294 ms

count.js

count.js

281 ms

logo-300x137.png

logo-300x137.png

160 ms

perspective.jpg

perspective.jpg

44 ms

Wireframe-preview-e1403041023205.jpg

Wireframe-preview-e1403041023205.jpg

49 ms

Macbook-pro-e1403040187676.png

Macbook-pro-e1403040187676.png

160 ms

A6-Mock-up+.jpg

A6-Mock-up+.jpg

44 ms

Featured-image1.jpg

Featured-image1.jpg

44 ms

Image-1-495x400.jpg

Image-1-495x400.jpg

46 ms

495x400+.jpg

495x400+.jpg

50 ms

okab-html.jpg

okab-html.jpg

48 ms

Skin-switcher-ng.png

Skin-switcher-ng.png

53 ms

Smart-demo-bar.jpg

Smart-demo-bar.jpg

46 ms

TH-36x36.jpg

TH-36x36.jpg

49 ms

Featured-image1-36x36.jpg

Featured-image1-36x36.jpg

51 ms

Featured-image-36x36.jpg

Featured-image-36x36.jpg

49 ms

perspective-36x36.jpg

perspective-36x36.jpg

52 ms

Macbook-pro-36x36.png

Macbook-pro-36x36.png

145 ms

Image-1-36x36.jpg

Image-1-36x36.jpg

41 ms

Wireframe-preview-36x36.jpg

Wireframe-preview-36x36.jpg

39 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

41 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

34 ms

print.css

print.css

5 ms

Accessibility Review

pixeldima.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

pixeldima.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pixeldima.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixeldima.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixeldima.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixeldima.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixel Dima. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: