Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

pixelpeeper.io

Learn to Edit Like Your Favorite Photographers · PixelPeeper

Page Load Speed

241 ms in total

First Response

23 ms

Resources Loaded

218 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

pixelpeeper.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pixelpeeper.io homepage info - get ready to check Pixel Peeper best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about pixelpeeper.io

Recover Lightroom edits and camera settings (EXIF) from JPG files. Learn how to edit like your favorite photographers.

Visit pixelpeeper.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixelpeeper.io page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 218 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixelpeeper.io performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixelpeeper.io

23 ms

pixelpeeper.com

117 ms

application-9c8053aae0d90db17b1c6a8ea4cde306f0bd1d82.css

12 ms

js

62 ms

examples.jpg

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pixelpeeper.io, 71% (5 requests) were made to Pixelpeeper.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (117 ms) relates to the external source Pixelpeeper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

693.5 kB

After Optimization

681.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Pixelpeeper.io main page is 693.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 668.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 585 B

  • Original 668.0 kB
  • After minification 667.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixel Peeper images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelpeeper.io has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixel Peeper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

pixelpeeper.io accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pixelpeeper.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

pixelpeeper.io SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelpeeper.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixelpeeper.io main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixel Peeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: