4 sec in total
554 ms
3.1 sec
317 ms
Welcome to pixeltoweb.co.in homepage info - get ready to check Pixeltoweb best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pixeltoweb.co.in
Mohan Vasam - Front-End Developer and Webdesigner, based in Hyderabad, India.
Visit pixeltoweb.co.inWe analyzed Pixeltoweb.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 554 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
pixeltoweb.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
554 ms
268 ms
465 ms
470 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Pixeltoweb.co.in, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixeltoweb.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 45.1 kB (4%)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixeltoweb.co.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixeltoweb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 715 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixeltoweb.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (32%)
44
30
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixeltoweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixeltoweb.co.in
554 ms
bootstrap.min.css
268 ms
component.css
465 ms
style.css
470 ms
css
34 ms
css
51 ms
font-awesome.min.css
48 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
bootstrap.min.js
517 ms
modernizr.custom.js
467 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
542 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
541 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
694 ms
stiky.js
692 ms
waypoints.min.js
702 ms
grid.js
726 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
bg.png
271 ms
profile-pic.jpg
531 ms
thumb21.jpg
442 ms
thumb22.jpg
678 ms
thumb23.jpg
467 ms
thumb17.jpg
490 ms
thumb9.jpg
495 ms
thumb1.jpg
666 ms
thumb2.jpg
703 ms
thumb3.jpg
726 ms
thumb4.jpg
719 ms
thumb5.jpg
773 ms
thumb7.jpg
1565 ms
thumb10.jpg
2045 ms
thumb6.jpg
939 ms
thumb8.jpg
944 ms
thumb11.jpg
961 ms
thumb12.jpg
1016 ms
thumb13.jpg
1179 ms
thumb14.jpg
1173 ms
thumb15.jpg
1198 ms
thumb18.jpg
1262 ms
thumb19.jpg
1622 ms
thumb20.jpg
1418 ms
thumb16.jpg
1672 ms
pattern.png
1510 ms
icons.png
1619 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
38 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
39 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
22 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
29 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
28 ms
collect
19 ms
pixeltoweb.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixeltoweb.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pixeltoweb.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixeltoweb.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pixeltoweb.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixeltoweb.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixeltoweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: