3.3 sec in total
341 ms
2.6 sec
293 ms
Click here to check amazing Pixelware content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixelware.com
Líder en la implantación de Plataformas de Contratación Electrónica, Licitación Electrónica y de Gestión de Expedientes de Contratación en España
Visit pixelware.comWe analyzed Pixelware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pixelware.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value2,250 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.166
71/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
341 ms
1295 ms
371 ms
351 ms
458 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Pixelware.com, 18% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixelware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 365.6 kB (20%)
1.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixelware.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 941.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 332.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 332.5 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pixelware needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 345 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelware.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)
42
24
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixelware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixelware.com
341 ms
pixelware.com
1295 ms
76ee4.css
371 ms
25f69.css
351 ms
818c0.js
458 ms
01f15.js
462 ms
96f3a.js
349 ms
all.js
55 ms
js
68 ms
style.css
125 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
57 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
58 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
66 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
80 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
81 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
81 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
79 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
79 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
73 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
80 ms
modules.woff
440 ms
a5ff7.css
163 ms
1f540.js
156 ms
b68ea.js
156 ms
caad7.js
265 ms
api.js
69 ms
e6deb.js
154 ms
2a6b9.js
278 ms
4407c.js
273 ms
1615d.js
271 ms
501dc.js
271 ms
recaptcha__en.js
96 ms
pixelware-logo-blanco-small.png
127 ms
icon-twitter.png
129 ms
icon-linkedin.png
120 ms
icon-youtube.png
119 ms
icon-rss.png
118 ms
clientes2.png
123 ms
movil.png
237 ms
Group-332.png
234 ms
Group-331.png
236 ms
Group-326.png
239 ms
Group-329.png
251 ms
Group-328.png
255 ms
Group-330.png
353 ms
IBM_logo-1.png
355 ms
Group-320.png
352 ms
Group-323.png
357 ms
Group-324.png
404 ms
OpenText_logo-1.png
382 ms
Contratacion-electronica-1.jpg
584 ms
Frame-66.jpg
484 ms
Frame-67.jpg
497 ms
Frame-65.jpg
497 ms
pixelware.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixelware.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pixelware.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixelware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixelware.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixelware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: