Tools & Wizards About Us
pixietech.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

pixietech.net

Web Designers Company in Nigeria | Web Design Services in Lagos - Pixie Technologies

Page Load Speed

14.5 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

11.6 sec

Page Rendered

550 ms

pixietech.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pixie Tech content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixietech.net

We are website designer and development company in Nigeria. We are experts in Website Design, Website Development, Mobile Apps Development, e-Commerce Website, Digital Marketing/SEO Services

Visit pixietech.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixietech.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixietech.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixietech.net

2312 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

128 ms

style.min.css

53 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

58 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Pixietech.net, 16% (16 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 16% (16 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixietech.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.9 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixietech.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 413.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 205.1 kB

  • Original 240.6 kB
  • After minification 237.1 kB
  • After compression 35.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 205.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 386.9 kB
  • After minification 386.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixie Tech images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 413.6 kB
  • After minification 413.6 kB
  • After compression 395.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 315.7 kB
  • After minification 315.7 kB
  • After compression 308.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixietech.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (80%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixie Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pixietech.net

pixietech.net

2312 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

128 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

53 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

58 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

56 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

203 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

59 ms

style.css

style.css

214 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

225 ms

11419-layout.css

11419-layout.css

216 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

67 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

218 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

222 ms

public.css

public.css

273 ms

photoswipe.min.css

photoswipe.min.css

281 ms

default-skin.min.css

default-skin.min.css

283 ms

jet-woo-product-gallery.css

jet-woo-product-gallery.css

291 ms

css

css

80 ms

all.css

all.css

374 ms

layout-max.css

layout-max.css

293 ms

social-logos.min.css

social-logos.min.css

60 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

56 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

62 ms

css

css

42 ms

13308-layout-partial.css

13308-layout-partial.css

305 ms

general.css

general.css

313 ms

nav-menu.css

nav-menu.css

314 ms

custom-jet-blocks.css

custom-jet-blocks.css

325 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

443 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

444 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

483 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

606 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

482 ms

post-19096.css

post-19096.css

590 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

590 ms

jet-tabs-frontend.css

jet-tabs-frontend.css

604 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

664 ms

global.css

global.css

660 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

684 ms

image-cdn.js

image-cdn.js

680 ms

fl-photo.js

fl-photo.js

721 ms

11419-layout.js

11419-layout.js

680 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

808 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

886 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

768 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

24 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

25 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

25 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

25 ms

vue.min.js

vue.min.js

786 ms

e-202405.js

e-202405.js

27 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

25 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

26 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

26 ms

jet-menu-public-scripts.js

jet-menu-public-scripts.js

766 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

688 ms

sticky-header.min.js

sticky-header.min.js

688 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

676 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

672 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

700 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

705 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

737 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

685 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

681 ms

jet-blocks.min.js

jet-blocks.min.js

711 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

710 ms

widgets-scripts.js

widgets-scripts.js

712 ms

jet-tabs-frontend.min.js

jet-tabs-frontend.min.js

690 ms

pixie-technologies-web-designer-in-lagos.png

pixie-technologies-web-designer-in-lagos.png

268 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

699 ms

company-profile-of-pixie-technologies.png

company-profile-of-pixie-technologies.png

501 ms

black-friday-ecommerce-shopping.jpg

black-friday-ecommerce-shopping.jpg

263 ms

mobile-apps-development-for-android-ios-platforms.png

mobile-apps-development-for-android-ios-platforms.png

235 ms

Aquinas-College-Akure-Ondo.jpg

Aquinas-College-Akure-Ondo.jpg

266 ms

Charvet-Group.jpg

Charvet-Group.jpg

264 ms

ANWBN-CIPE.jpg

ANWBN-CIPE.jpg

263 ms

canbel_technologies.jpg

canbel_technologies.jpg

271 ms

belformnigeria.jpg

belformnigeria.jpg

289 ms

center-core-ltd.jpg

center-core-ltd.jpg

289 ms

mobinet-international-company.jpg

mobinet-international-company.jpg

305 ms

CIBEK-Hotel-and-Resort.jpg

CIBEK-Hotel-and-Resort.jpg

306 ms

How-to-choose-a-Good-Domain-Name.jpeg

How-to-choose-a-Good-Domain-Name.jpeg

305 ms

ecommerce-store.jpg

ecommerce-store.jpg

384 ms

hosting-server.jpg

hosting-server.jpg

419 ms

Importance-Of-Website-For-Your-Business.jpg

Importance-Of-Website-For-Your-Business.jpg

387 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

39 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

670 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

637 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

638 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

593 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

594 ms

theme-icons.woff

theme-icons.woff

774 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

138 ms

mobile-header.css

mobile-header.css

71 ms

layout-max-low.css

layout-max-low.css

71 ms

layout-below-max.css

layout-below-max.css

74 ms

layout-small.css

layout-small.css

78 ms

pixie-technologies-profile-logo-2.png

pixie-technologies-profile-logo-2.png

1843 ms

Accessibility Review

pixietech.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pixietech.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pixietech.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixietech.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixietech.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixietech.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixie Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: