2.6 sec in total
432 ms
1.8 sec
309 ms
Visit pixingo.com now to see the best up-to-date Pixingo content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixingo.com
Push the envelope and put a smile in someone's mailbox.
Visit pixingo.comWe analyzed Pixingo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
pixingo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value25.9 s
0/100
10%
Value31.5 s
0/100
25%
Value25.9 s
0/100
10%
Value1,120 ms
23/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value39.3 s
0/100
10%
432 ms
56 ms
217 ms
216 ms
147 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Pixingo.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (742 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixingo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 487.6 kB (19%)
2.5 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixingo.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.0 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixingo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 248.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixingo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (50%)
88
44
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixingo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixingo.com
432 ms
jquery-ui.css
56 ms
fonts.css
217 ms
normalize.css
216 ms
layout.css
147 ms
style.css
300 ms
menu.css
152 ms
nav.css
239 ms
jquery.min.js
598 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
9 ms
jquery.json-2.3.min.js
292 ms
html5placeholder.jquery.js
301 ms
jquery.simplemodal-1.4.2.js
383 ms
jquery.equal-height-columns.js
347 ms
jquery.color.js
438 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
444 ms
additional-methods.min.js
372 ms
jquery.youtubepopup.min.js
433 ms
TweenLite.min.js
520 ms
TimelineLite.min.js
458 ms
CSSPlugin.min.js
510 ms
EasePack.min.js
513 ms
template.js
523 ms
swfobject.js
539 ms
home.css
532 ms
home-forms.css
533 ms
home.js
534 ms
jquery.slider.js
583 ms
slider.css
582 ms
pinit.js
6 ms
bannerbg.png
250 ms
all.js
20 ms
logo.png
104 ms
button-gradient-orange.png
99 ms
button-gradient-green.png
101 ms
nav-bg.png
102 ms
nav-bg-gradient.png
101 ms
banner-flaps.png
179 ms
safe-standard.js
48 ms
homegallery1-bg.png
159 ms
slider_click_ship.jpg
222 ms
anywhere_slider.png
228 ms
photobooks_slider.png
513 ms
megabytes_slider_webv2_old.jpg
572 ms
no_time_to_shop.jpg
403 ms
canvas_wraps.jpg
381 ms
handwriting_font.jpg
308 ms
wedding_web_homepage.jpg
380 ms
schedule_slider.jpg
388 ms
big-penguin.png
489 ms
bg101.png
451 ms
studio-huge.png
475 ms
baby.png
509 ms
pbook.png
531 ms
baby101.png
571 ms
poster101.png
574 ms
points101.png
595 ms
funds101.png
591 ms
life101.png
618 ms
pro101.png
663 ms
guy.png
660 ms
freedemo.png
664 ms
more-info.png
679 ms
form-arrow.png
668 ms
form-arrow-2.png
703 ms
submit.png
733 ms
facebook.png
738 ms
twitter.png
742 ms
76 ms
youtube.png
662 ms
pinterest.png
678 ms
pixingo_instagram.png
739 ms
tips_pix_icon.png
727 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
xd_arbiter.php
42 ms
xd_arbiter.php
60 ms
faq.png
682 ms
pinit_main.js
40 ms
collect
26 ms
penguin-cash.png
668 ms
footer-logo.png
664 ms
collect
54 ms
personal-still-homepage.png
699 ms
form-bg-2.png
731 ms
form-bg.png
681 ms
purple-triangle.png
587 ms
vert.png
519 ms
slide-left.png
546 ms
slide-right.png
583 ms
prevball.png
571 ms
nextball.png
532 ms
pixingo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
pixingo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
pixingo.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixingo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pixingo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixingo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixingo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: