Tools & Wizards About Us
pixogee.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

pixogee.com

E-Commerce and Web Consultants - Based in California

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

250 ms

pixogee.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pixogee.com now to see the best up-to-date Pixogee content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixogee.com

Solve E-Commerce and Online Challenges with Cost Effective Solutions that Make Sense

Visit pixogee.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixogee.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixogee.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixogee.com

174 ms

pixogee.com

229 ms

www.pixogee.com

292 ms

autoptimize_30f209039f261eb810fbe217a5fdd879.css

20 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Pixogee.com, 24% (4 requests) were made to D3lbgclgw47nh9.cloudfront.net and 6% (1 request) were made to App.posthog.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixogee.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 49.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

453.1 kB

After Optimization

404.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixogee.com main page is 453.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 205.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixogee images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 44 B

  • Original 205.2 kB
  • After minification 205.2 kB
  • After compression 205.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 691 B

  • Original 157.1 kB
  • After minification 157.1 kB
  • After compression 156.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixogee.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixogee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pixogee.com

pixogee.com

174 ms

pixogee.com

pixogee.com

229 ms

www.pixogee.com

www.pixogee.com

292 ms

autoptimize_30f209039f261eb810fbe217a5fdd879.css

autoptimize_30f209039f261eb810fbe217a5fdd879.css

20 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

jscripts.php

jscripts.php

98 ms

jscripts-ftr-min.js

jscripts-ftr-min.js

57 ms

autoptimize_6b468af45ddc7229ba94f236fca9e78a.js

autoptimize_6b468af45ddc7229ba94f236fca9e78a.js

62 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

294 ms

array.js

array.js

33 ms

pixogee_logo_with_owl-1.png

pixogee_logo_with_owl-1.png

292 ms

mobile_logo_with_tagline.png

mobile_logo_with_tagline.png

34 ms

name_only.png

name_only.png

250 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

269 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

428 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

284 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

1128 ms

Accessibility Review

pixogee.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

pixogee.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

pixogee.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixogee.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixogee.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixogee.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixogee. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: