Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 63% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

Page Load Speed

54.5 sec in total

First Response

419 ms

Resources Loaded

26.1 sec

Page Rendered

27.9 sec

pixshock.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pixshock content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixshock.net

Visit pixshock.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixshock.net page load time and found that the first response time was 419 ms and then it took 54 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixshock.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,650 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixshock.net

419 ms

www.pixshock.net

1203 ms

css

484 ms

system.base.css

484 ms

system.messages.css

486 ms

Our browser made a total of 241 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (222 requests) were addressed to the original Pixshock.net, 2% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixshock.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (21%)

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Pixshock.net main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 161.1 kB

  • Original 190.9 kB
  • After minification 172.2 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 316.2 kB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixshock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 616.0 kB

  • Original 913.1 kB
  • After minification 847.8 kB
  • After compression 297.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 616.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 72.0 kB

  • Original 89.9 kB
  • After minification 69.7 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixshock.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (20%)

Requests Now

235

After Optimization

187

The browser has sent 235 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixshock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pixshock.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pixshock.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pixshock.net SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixshock.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pixshock.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixshock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: