Tools & Wizards About Us
placerinspection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

placerinspection.com

Home - Placer Inspection

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

116 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

363 ms

placerinspection.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Placer Inspection content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about placerinspection.com

Visit placerinspection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Placerinspection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

placerinspection.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.424

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

placerinspection.com

116 ms

placerinspection.com

4545 ms

css

41 ms

layerslider.css

77 ms

styles.css

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Placerinspection.com, 7% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Placerinspection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Placerinspection.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 57.7 kB

  • Original 69.1 kB
  • After minification 66.6 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 240 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Placer Inspection images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 442.2 kB
  • After minification 441.8 kB
  • After compression 438.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 167.0 kB
  • After minification 166.3 kB
  • After compression 161.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Placerinspection.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (81%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Placer Inspection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 62 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

placerinspection.com

placerinspection.com

116 ms

placerinspection.com

placerinspection.com

4545 ms

css

css

41 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

77 ms

styles.css

styles.css

146 ms

style.css

style.css

155 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

167 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

182 ms

style.css

style.css

186 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

288 ms

print.css

print.css

212 ms

webkit_stylesheet.css

webkit_stylesheet.css

216 ms

style_dynamic.css

style_dynamic.css

223 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

263 ms

style_dynamic_responsive.css

style_dynamic_responsive.css

250 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

355 ms

custom_css.css

custom_css.css

282 ms

style.css

style.css

323 ms

style.css

style.css

324 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

377 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

399 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

347 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

406 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

386 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

422 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

420 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

459 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

439 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

451 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

465 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

477 ms

wp-a11y.min.js

wp-a11y.min.js

474 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

505 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

504 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

520 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

519 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

537 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

539 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

561 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

41 ms

droppable.min.js

droppable.min.js

491 ms

progressbar.min.js

progressbar.min.js

451 ms

selectable.min.js

selectable.min.js

448 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

442 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

422 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

440 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

431 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

438 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

443 ms

effect-blind.min.js

effect-blind.min.js

413 ms

effect-bounce.min.js

effect-bounce.min.js

407 ms

effect-clip.min.js

effect-clip.min.js

406 ms

effect-drop.min.js

effect-drop.min.js

377 ms

style.css

style.css

393 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

26 ms

effect-explode.min.js

effect-explode.min.js

446 ms

effect-fade.min.js

effect-fade.min.js

427 ms

effect-fold.min.js

effect-fold.min.js

405 ms

effect-highlight.min.js

effect-highlight.min.js

400 ms

effect-pulsate.min.js

effect-pulsate.min.js

391 ms

effect-size.min.js

effect-size.min.js

406 ms

effect-scale.min.js

effect-scale.min.js

398 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

383 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

383 ms

effect-transfer.min.js

effect-transfer.min.js

365 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

510 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js

388 ms

lemmon-slider.min.js

lemmon-slider.min.js

380 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.js

jquery.fullPage.min.js

373 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

369 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

359 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

452 ms

jquery.stretch.js

jquery.stretch.js

438 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

436 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

420 ms

smoothPageScroll.min.js

smoothPageScroll.min.js

417 ms

default_dynamic.js

default_dynamic.js

549 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

548 ms

custom_js.js

custom_js.js

522 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

515 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

513 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

507 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

491 ms

logo.png

logo.png

347 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

491 ms

our_mission-1.jpg

our_mission-1.jpg

450 ms

our-gaol.png

our-gaol.png

451 ms

biotechnical.jpg

biotechnical.jpg

417 ms

electronic-hardware.jpg

electronic-hardware.jpg

451 ms

pharma.jpg

pharma.jpg

461 ms

contract-manufacturing-home.jpg

contract-manufacturing-home.jpg

460 ms

Quality-Control-home.jpg

Quality-Control-home.jpg

504 ms

Validation-Engineering-home.jpg

Validation-Engineering-home.jpg

522 ms

system-anomatioon.jpg

system-anomatioon.jpg

502 ms

coil-winder-home.jpg

coil-winder-home.jpg

520 ms

core-wire-home.jpg

core-wire-home.jpg

495 ms

laser-welding.jpg

laser-welding.jpg

521 ms

our_goal_background.jpg

our_goal_background.jpg

552 ms

resources_background.jpg

resources_background.jpg

603 ms

foorter_background.jpg

foorter_background.jpg

584 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

45 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

106 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

106 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

217 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

217 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

218 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

515 ms

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7p4HM-M.ttf

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7p4HM-M.ttf

254 ms

skin.css

skin.css

213 ms

Accessibility Review

placerinspection.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

placerinspection.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

placerinspection.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Placerinspection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Placerinspection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

placerinspection.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Placer Inspection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: