Tools & Wizards About Us
planning.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

planning.net

Planning Guides: Your Roadmap to Business Growth & Success

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

657 ms

Page Rendered

373 ms

planning.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Planning content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about planning.net

Key strategies and expert insights on building credit, securing loans, and maximizing tax credits to unlock the potential of tomorrow's leaders.

Visit planning.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Planning.net page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

planning.net performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

planning.net

165 ms

planning.net

173 ms

style.min.css

36 ms

widget-options.css

66 ms

extendify-utilities.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Planning.net, 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (262 ms) belongs to the original domain Planning.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

596.5 kB

After Optimization

361.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Planning.net main page is 596.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 275.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 234.9 kB

  • Original 275.7 kB
  • After minification 274.1 kB
  • After compression 40.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 234.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 250.9 kB
  • After minification 250.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Planning images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 54 B

  • Original 40.9 kB
  • After minification 40.9 kB
  • After compression 40.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 137 B

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 28.9 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Planning.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (56%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Planning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

planning.net

planning.net

165 ms

planning.net

planning.net

173 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

36 ms

widget-options.css

widget-options.css

66 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

86 ms

wpel.css

wpel.css

90 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

92 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

92 ms

offside.min.css

offside.min.css

87 ms

navigation-branding-flex.min.css

navigation-branding-flex.min.css

93 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

143 ms

js

js

72 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

118 ms

offside.min.js

offside.min.js

114 ms

smooth-scroll.min.js

smooth-scroll.min.js

115 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

117 ms

navigation-search.min.js

navigation-search.min.js

119 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

262 ms

shogun-roasting-net-30-review-500x250.jpg

shogun-roasting-net-30-review-500x250.jpg

87 ms

fidex-tech-net-30-review-500x250.jpg

fidex-tech-net-30-review-500x250.jpg

87 ms

ohana-office-products-review-500x250.jpg

ohana-office-products-review-500x250.jpg

44 ms

erc-self-employed-500x250.jpg

erc-self-employed-500x250.jpg

88 ms

restaurant-business-loans-500x250.jpg

restaurant-business-loans-500x250.jpg

88 ms

erc-supply-chain-disruption-500x250.jpg

erc-supply-chain-disruption-500x250.jpg

89 ms

erc-for-restaurants-500x250.jpg

erc-for-restaurants-500x250.jpg

88 ms

erc-taxable-income-500x250.jpg

erc-taxable-income-500x250.jpg

89 ms

credit-limit-system-500x250.jpg

credit-limit-system-500x250.jpg

90 ms

Accessibility Review

planning.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

planning.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

planning.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Planning.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Planning.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

planning.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Planning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: