Tools & Wizards About Us
plastiprofile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

plastiprofile.com

Plastiprofile | Plastic Extrusion Manufacturers in Johannesburg

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

746 ms

Resources Loaded

7.7 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

plastiprofile.com screenshot

About Website

Visit plastiprofile.com now to see the best up-to-date Plastiprofile content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about plastiprofile.com

PlastiProfile is a plastic extrusion manufacturer. We specialise in the production of plastic products.

Visit plastiprofile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Plastiprofile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 746 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

plastiprofile.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value38.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,970 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.249

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

plastiprofile.com

746 ms

plastiprofile.com

1551 ms

js

60 ms

css

31 ms

style.min.css

1009 ms

Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Plastiprofile.com, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Plastiprofile.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (62%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Plastiprofile.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 63.7 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 80.0 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 696.1 kB
  • After minification 685.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plastiprofile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB
  • After compression 721.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 187.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plastiprofile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 97 (90%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plastiprofile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 77 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

plastiprofile.com

plastiprofile.com

746 ms

plastiprofile.com

plastiprofile.com

1551 ms

js

js

60 ms

css

css

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1009 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

764 ms

css

css

18 ms

styles.css

styles.css

744 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1014 ms

style.css

style.css

765 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1020 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1233 ms

style.css

style.css

1018 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

1022 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

2521 ms

print.css

print.css

1263 ms

webkit_stylesheet.css

webkit_stylesheet.css

1269 ms

style_dynamic.css

style_dynamic.css

1273 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

1777 ms

style_dynamic_responsive.css

style_dynamic_responsive.css

1479 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

2546 ms

custom_css.css

custom_css.css

1520 ms

style.css

style.css

1526 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

1725 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1779 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1782 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

2217 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

2030 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

2031 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

2559 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

2287 ms

css

css

23 ms

index.js

index.js

2038 ms

index.js

index.js

2221 ms

cf7-google-analytics.min.js

cf7-google-analytics.min.js

2297 ms

components.js

components.js

2298 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

2466 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

2524 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

2540 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

2546 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

2545 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

api.js

api.js

54 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

2547 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

2220 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

2264 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2278 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

2284 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

2034 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

2033 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

2189 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

2257 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

2062 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

2037 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

2032 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

2037 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

1975 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

2009 ms

style.css

style.css

2020 ms

droppable.min.js

droppable.min.js

1895 ms

progressbar.min.js

progressbar.min.js

1841 ms

selectable.min.js

selectable.min.js

1841 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

1960 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

1752 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

1767 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

1582 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1521 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

1528 ms

effect-blind.min.js

effect-blind.min.js

1523 ms

effect-bounce.min.js

effect-bounce.min.js

1489 ms

effect-clip.min.js

effect-clip.min.js

1504 ms

effect-drop.min.js

effect-drop.min.js

1491 ms

effect-explode.min.js

effect-explode.min.js

1498 ms

effect-fade.min.js

effect-fade.min.js

1511 ms

effect-fold.min.js

effect-fold.min.js

1523 ms

effect-highlight.min.js

effect-highlight.min.js

1513 ms

effect-pulsate.min.js

effect-pulsate.min.js

1514 ms

effect-size.min.js

effect-size.min.js

1507 ms

effect-scale.min.js

effect-scale.min.js

1516 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

1530 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

1520 ms

effect-transfer.min.js

effect-transfer.min.js

1512 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1762 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js

1510 ms

lemmon-slider.min.js

lemmon-slider.min.js

1517 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.js

jquery.fullPage.min.js

1528 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

1522 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

1512 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1604 ms

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

packery-mode.pkgd.min.js

1604 ms

jquery.stretch.js

jquery.stretch.js

1603 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

1667 ms

smoothPageScroll.min.js

smoothPageScroll.min.js

1584 ms

default_dynamic.js

default_dynamic.js

1523 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

1692 ms

custom_js.js

custom_js.js

1449 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1466 ms

ga.js

ga.js

43 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1598 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

68 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

82 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

109 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

99 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

99 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

106 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

108 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

108 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

108 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

43 ms

index.js

index.js

1545 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1594 ms

Plastiprofile-logo-transparent-1.png

Plastiprofile-logo-transparent-1.png

1595 ms

logo_black.png

logo_black.png

1594 ms

mobile_logo.png

mobile_logo.png

1678 ms

Plastiprofile-slider2-1.jpg

Plastiprofile-slider2-1.jpg

1731 ms

Plastiprofile-slider3-4.jpg

Plastiprofile-slider3-4.jpg

1580 ms

Plastiprofile-slider4-bluegreen.jpg

Plastiprofile-slider4-bluegreen.jpg

1558 ms

Plastiprofile-WhoIsPlastiprofile-800x400.jpg

Plastiprofile-WhoIsPlastiprofile-800x400.jpg

1603 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

75 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

307 ms

Accessibility Review

plastiprofile.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

plastiprofile.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

plastiprofile.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plastiprofile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plastiprofile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

plastiprofile.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Plastiprofile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: