Tools & Wizards About Us
pliteq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

pliteq.com

Pliteq | Building Products For A Sustainable Built Environment

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

594 ms

pliteq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pliteq content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pliteq.com

Pliteq creates building products for noise & vibration control by re-engineering unusable material diverted from landfill for a sustainable built environment.

Visit pliteq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pliteq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pliteq.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.306

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pliteq.com

50 ms

pliteq.com

679 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

14 ms

all.min.css

25 ms

slick.min.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Pliteq.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) belongs to the original domain Pliteq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 201.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pliteq.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 597.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 191.3 kB

  • Original 221.3 kB
  • After minification 215.1 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 597.7 kB
  • After minification 597.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pliteq images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 200.6 kB
  • After minification 200.6 kB
  • After compression 199.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 187.9 kB
  • After minification 187.5 kB
  • After compression 178.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pliteq.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (92%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pliteq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pliteq.com

pliteq.com

50 ms

pliteq.com

pliteq.com

679 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

14 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

25 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

34 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

18 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

18 ms

blocks.style.css

blocks.style.css

27 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

27 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

ctc-style.css

ctc-style.css

33 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

36 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

50 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

36 ms

post-810.css

post-810.css

37 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

67 ms

global.css

global.css

61 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

55 ms

post-388.css

post-388.css

59 ms

post-371.css

post-371.css

64 ms

pwaforwp-main.min.css

pwaforwp-main.min.css

65 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

66 ms

ecs-style.css

ecs-style.css

80 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

84 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

79 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

78 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

81 ms

css

css

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

95 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

82 ms

js

js

285 ms

ecs_ajax_pagination.js

ecs_ajax_pagination.js

81 ms

ecs.js

ecs.js

82 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

93 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

244 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

91 ms

smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js

smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js

91 ms

vue@2.6.11

vue@2.6.11

77 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

136 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

86 ms

frontend.blocks.js

frontend.blocks.js

127 ms

dynamic-conditions-public.js

dynamic-conditions-public.js

126 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

118 ms

pwaforwp.min.js

pwaforwp.min.js

137 ms

pwaforwp-video.js

pwaforwp-video.js

112 ms

pwaforwp-download.js

pwaforwp-download.js

136 ms

pwa-register-sw-1.js

pwa-register-sw-1.js

137 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

137 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

208 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

212 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

212 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

211 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

202 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

195 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

197 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

186 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

186 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

186 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

186 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

187 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

183 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

182 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

182 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

182 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

181 ms

hotjar-2737552.js

hotjar-2737552.js

266 ms

home_header_slider1-e1579545771432.png

home_header_slider1-e1579545771432.png

182 ms

pliteq-flooring-banner.webp

pliteq-flooring-banner.webp

178 ms

home_header_slider2.png

home_header_slider2.png

181 ms

sound-vibration.png

sound-vibration.png

178 ms

pliteq-flooring-logo.webp

pliteq-flooring-logo.webp

176 ms

8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG

8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG

28 ms

Formata-Regular.ttf

Formata-Regular.ttf

32 ms

Formata-Bold.ttf

Formata-Bold.ttf

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

85 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

85 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

31 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

31 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

31 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

84 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

33 ms

print.css

print.css

23 ms

modules.e4b2dc39f985f11fb1e4.js

modules.e4b2dc39f985f11fb1e4.js

29 ms

pliteq_logo_original-300x55.png

pliteq_logo_original-300x55.png

18 ms

Accessibility Review

pliteq.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pliteq.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pliteq.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pliteq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pliteq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pliteq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pliteq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: