Tools & Wizards About Us
plombas.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

plombas.ru

Всё для опечатывания и опломбирования. Банковское и торговое оборудование. Пломбы, урны для мусора, металлические шкафы.

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

463 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

262 ms

plombas.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to plombas.ru homepage info - get ready to check Plombas best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about plombas.ru

Продажа банковского, торгового, инкассаторского, хозяйственного оборудования. Пломбы, урны для мусора, устройства для опломбирования и опечатывания. Производство. Скидки. Доставка

Visit plombas.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Plombas.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 463 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

plombas.ru performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.133

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

plombas.ru

463 ms

plombas.ru

570 ms

plombi.ru

1067 ms

script.jquery.1.11.min.js

276 ms

waTheme.js

396 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Plombas.ru, 79% (58 requests) were made to Plombi.ru and 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Plombi.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.8 kB (14%)

Content Size

758.9 kB

After Optimization

652.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Plombas.ru main page is 758.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 368.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 93.3 kB

  • Original 116.0 kB
  • After minification 115.0 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 368.4 kB
  • After minification 358.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plombas images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 195.1 kB
  • After minification 195.1 kB
  • After compression 193.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 79.3 kB
  • After compression 78.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plombas.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (50%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plombas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

plombas.ru

plombas.ru

463 ms

plombas.ru

plombas.ru

570 ms

plombi.ru

plombi.ru

1067 ms

script.jquery.1.11.min.js

script.jquery.1.11.min.js

276 ms

waTheme.js

waTheme.js

396 ms

qdiscount.js

qdiscount.js

405 ms

jquery.colorhelpers.js

jquery.colorhelpers.js

412 ms

shopBdgPlugin.js

shopBdgPlugin.js

429 ms

quantity.js

quantity.js

527 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

679 ms

scheme.light.min.css

scheme.light.min.css

554 ms

Appetite.css

Appetite.css

569 ms

tmp0.qdiscount.css

tmp0.qdiscount.css

698 ms

shopBdgPlugin.css

shopBdgPlugin.css

701 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

928 ms

style.shop.min.css

style.shop.min.css

695 ms

script.shop.min.js

script.shop.min.js

749 ms

extra.min.css

extra.min.css

818 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

834 ms

whhg.min.css

whhg.min.css

1166 ms

emoji.min.css

emoji.min.css

962 ms

emoji.min.css

emoji.min.css

856 ms

ruble.min.css

ruble.min.css

962 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

981 ms

888 ms

snow.png

snow.png

882 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

550 ms

image_1.jpg

image_1.jpg

716 ms

image_30.jpeg

image_30.jpeg

717 ms

image_8.jpg

image_8.jpg

574 ms

image_27.jpg

image_27.jpg

715 ms

image_2.jpg

image_2.jpg

716 ms

image_31.jpeg

image_31.jpeg

1095 ms

image_25.jpg

image_25.jpg

872 ms

image_12.jpg

image_12.jpg

817 ms

image_13.jpg

image_13.jpg

822 ms

image_16.png

image_16.png

848 ms

image_4.jpg

image_4.jpg

889 ms

image_26.jpg

image_26.jpg

951 ms

image_21.jpg

image_21.jpg

957 ms

image_24.jpg

image_24.jpg

986 ms

image_22.jpg

image_22.jpg

1106 ms

image_23.jpg

image_23.jpg

1039 ms

image_29.jpeg

image_29.jpeg

1083 ms

image_28.jpg

image_28.jpg

1097 ms

pochta.png

pochta.png

1114 ms

dl.png

dl.png

1165 ms

sdek.jpg

sdek.jpg

1187 ms

pek.jpg

pek.jpg

1181 ms

mc.png

mc.png

1090 ms

visa.png

visa.png

1182 ms

sb.png

sb.png

1054 ms

ym.png

ym.png

1116 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1033 ms

extra.woff

extra.woff

899 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

755 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

837 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

928 ms

es5-shims.min.js

es5-shims.min.js

522 ms

share.js

share.js

862 ms

tag.js

tag.js

1046 ms

jquery.waitforimages.min.js

jquery.waitforimages.min.js

870 ms

alsrubl-arial-bold.woff

alsrubl-arial-bold.woff

818 ms

alsrubl-arial-regular.woff

alsrubl-arial-regular.woff

846 ms

css

css

51 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kg.woff

70 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCRc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCRc-AMP6lQ.woff

91 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCRc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCRc-AMP6lQ.woff

98 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lQ.woff

99 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xFIzQXKMny.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xFIzQXKMny.woff

115 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc3CsLYl4BO.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc3CsLYl4BO.woff

96 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc3CsLYl4BO.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc3CsLYl4BO.woff

102 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic3CsLYl4BO.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic3CsLYl4BO.woff

70 ms

Accessibility Review

plombas.ru accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

plombas.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

plombas.ru SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plombas.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plombas.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

plombas.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Plombas. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: