2.2 sec in total
153 ms
1.5 sec
584 ms
Visit plymouth-church.net now to see the best up-to-date Plymouth Church content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about plymouth-church.net
Visit plymouth-church.netWe analyzed Plymouth-church.net page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
plymouth-church.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value5,290 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.054
98/100
15%
Value22.3 s
1/100
10%
153 ms
86 ms
15 ms
18 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Plymouth-church.net, 9% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) belongs to the original domain Plymouth-church.net.
Page size can be reduced by 227.5 kB (10%)
2.2 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Plymouth-church.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plymouth Church images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plymouth-church.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (83%)
78
13
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plymouth Church. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
plymouth-church.net
153 ms
www.plymouth-church.net
86 ms
select2.min.css
15 ms
iconfonts.css
18 ms
frontend.min.css
47 ms
tooltip.css
45 ms
tooltipster-sideTip-shadow.min.css
44 ms
featherlight.css
43 ms
lity.min.css
40 ms
mec-general-calendar.css
40 ms
style.min.css
82 ms
style.css
78 ms
style.css
82 ms
style.css
77 ms
styles.css
78 ms
staff-directory.css
79 ms
lity.min.css
93 ms
styles.min.css
93 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
89 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.css
90 ms
slick.css
87 ms
generic-no-float.min.css
91 ms
dflip.min.css
120 ms
jquery.min.js
125 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
116 ms
mec-general-calendar.js
125 ms
tooltip.js
123 ms
frontend.js
118 ms
events.js
125 ms
snap.svg-min.js
130 ms
js
140 ms
api.js
129 ms
core.min.js
129 ms
datepicker.min.js
128 ms
jquery.typewatch.js
128 ms
featherlight.js
129 ms
select2.full.min.js
128 ms
lity.min.js
137 ms
colorbrightness.min.js
129 ms
api.js
138 ms
popper.min.js
122 ms
api.js
156 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
135 ms
index.js
134 ms
index.js
126 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
105 ms
bootstrap.min.js
105 ms
lity.min.js
109 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
110 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
107 ms
slick.min.js
72 ms
wpo.js
74 ms
wpo-settings.js
72 ms
wpo-utility.js
74 ms
wpo-snap-svg.js
76 ms
wpo-lazy-loader.js
71 ms
wpo-common.js
69 ms
dflip.min.js
67 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
64 ms
index.js
65 ms
css2
63 ms
css2
78 ms
gtm.js
199 ms
logo.svg
187 ms
recaptcha__en.js
288 ms
RED2-11-e1609177505336.jpg
221 ms
hero_swoop.svg
179 ms
Don-Olsen-DSC_1619.jpg
219 ms
united-nations-covid-19-response-g4z85Zc-ZqI-unsplash.jpg
181 ms
alexander-dummer-UH-xs-FizTk-unsplash.jpg
190 ms
Don-Olsen-DSC_6324b.jpg
219 ms
footer_border.svg
185 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf
95 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf
403 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf
403 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf
404 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf
403 ms
o-0FIpksx3QOlH0.ttf
405 ms
fa-light-300.woff
30 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
30 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
26 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
25 ms
anchor
146 ms
anchor
140 ms
ajax-loader.gif
430 ms
styles__ltr.css
48 ms
recaptcha__en.js
51 ms
81IjrRH91DAKpIx-VEJHPdpf7wiRaH8tg-uktu3LK4I.js
126 ms
webworker.js
116 ms
LdkrfvGznG7C1HMIvZeXpqeQHj2pK-25iJPmRAnKECo.js
77 ms
logo_48.png
63 ms
plymouth-church.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
plymouth-church.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
plymouth-church.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plymouth-church.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plymouth-church.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
plymouth-church.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Plymouth Church. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: