Tools & Wizards About Us
pm-review.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

pm-review.com

Powder Metallurgy Review: The magazine for the PM industry

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

395 ms

pm-review.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pm-review.com now to see the best up-to-date PM Review content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pm-review.com

Powder Metallurgy Review: The magazine for the PM industry. Powder Metallurgy Review covers the full powder metal business. Material processing...

Visit pm-review.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pm-review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pm-review.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pm-review.com

24 ms

pm-review.com

40 ms

www.pm-review.com

236 ms

jquery.min.js

13 ms

search-navigation.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Pm-review.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (500 ms) relates to the external source Log.cookieyes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 176.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pm-review.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

  • Original 98.7 kB
  • After minification 96.8 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 79.2 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PM Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 428.6 kB
  • After minification 428.6 kB
  • After compression 418.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 141.7 kB
  • After minification 141.7 kB
  • After compression 128.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pm-review.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (71%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PM Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pm-review.com

pm-review.com

24 ms

pm-review.com

pm-review.com

40 ms

www.pm-review.com

www.pm-review.com

236 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

13 ms

search-navigation.css

search-navigation.css

30 ms

moby-scripts.js

moby-scripts.js

27 ms

js

js

84 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

175 ms

script.js

script.js

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

17 ms

events-manager.min.css

events-manager.min.css

17 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

22 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

124 ms

algolia-autocomplete.css

algolia-autocomplete.css

24 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

69 ms

ol-fancybox.css

ol-fancybox.css

28 ms

style.css

style.css

66 ms

styles.css

styles.css

69 ms

log

log

500 ms

css

css

123 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

97 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

97 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

97 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

97 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

96 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

96 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

137 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

114 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

114 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

141 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

114 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

114 ms

events-manager.js

events-manager.js

154 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

149 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

149 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

149 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

149 ms

moby-pm-review.css

moby-pm-review.css

149 ms

pm-review.css

pm-review.css

192 ms

embed.js

embed.js

152 ms

counter.js

counter.js

189 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

189 ms

socialsnap.css

socialsnap.css

189 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

199 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

189 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

199 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

200 ms

algoliasearch-lite.umd.js

algoliasearch-lite.umd.js

201 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

201 ms

autocomplete-noconflict.js

autocomplete-noconflict.js

200 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

201 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

200 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

202 ms

jquery.elevatezoom.js

jquery.elevatezoom.js

201 ms

ol-fancybox.js

ol-fancybox.js

202 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

203 ms

socialsnap.js

socialsnap.js

275 ms

Banner-3.jpg

Banner-3.jpg

82 ms

pm_review_title.svg

pm_review_title.svg

83 ms

PM-REVIEW-JULY-2022-580-x-74-BANNER.jpg

PM-REVIEW-JULY-2022-580-x-74-BANNER.jpg

82 ms

Magazine-articles-composite-image.png

Magazine-articles-composite-image.png

85 ms

slide01-WEB.jpg

slide01-WEB.jpg

87 ms

article-3.png

article-3.png

84 ms

Magazine-PMR-Spring-2024-web.jpg

Magazine-PMR-Spring-2024-web.jpg

86 ms

iPAD-web.png

iPAD-web.png

88 ms

horizontal-pmr-buyers-guide.png

horizontal-pmr-buyers-guide.png

85 ms

ezgif.com-gif-maker-3.gif

ezgif.com-gif-maker-3.gif

87 ms

tz-1.jpg

tz-1.jpg

86 ms

2023-AIP-banner.webp

2023-AIP-banner.webp

301 ms

Advert_PMReview.gif

Advert_PMReview.gif

92 ms

Anzeige_PIM_Banner_March2021_V2-1.webp

Anzeige_PIM_Banner_March2021_V2-1.webp

291 ms

PM-Anzeige-02-12-19.gif

PM-Anzeige-02-12-19.gif

92 ms

S3R-Banner-2024_PowderMet-banner.gif

S3R-Banner-2024_PowderMet-banner.gif

91 ms

Metal-powders-in-Ar-n-1.png

Metal-powders-in-Ar-n-1.png

91 ms

300x250_arburgXworld_2020-03-01_en_GB.jpg

300x250_arburgXworld_2020-03-01_en_GB.jpg

145 ms

DSH-Banner-Ad-300x250-1.png

DSH-Banner-Ad-300x250-1.png

145 ms

web-banner-Metal-AM_ECM-Technologies-copy.webp

web-banner-Metal-AM_ECM-Technologies-copy.webp

127 ms

ASL-Web-Banner-ad2-.gif

ASL-Web-Banner-ad2-.gif

145 ms

ipad-web.png

ipad-web.png

146 ms

iPAD1-web.png

iPAD1-web.png

221 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

58 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

134 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

476 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

132 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

134 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

133 ms

main.js

main.js

15 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

14 ms

Accessibility Review

pm-review.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pm-review.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pm-review.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pm-review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pm-review.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pm-review.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PM Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: