Tools & Wizards About Us
pochtabank.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

pochtabank.ru

Почта Банк кредиты наличными, дебетовые и кредитные карты, рефинансирование кредитов, вклады и ипотека

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

375 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

pochtabank.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pochtabank content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pochtabank.ru

Все виды банковских продуктов: кредиты, кредитные карты, вклады, ипотека, инвестиции, онлайн-банкинг. Широкий спектр кредитных продуктов, пенсионное и зарплатное обслуживание. Быстрое и удобное оформл...

Visit pochtabank.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Pochtabank.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 375 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pochtabank.ru performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value36.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value65,380 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.299

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value91.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pochtabank.ru

375 ms

www.pochtabank.ru

971 ms

optimize.js

61 ms

168ff4dd899909b1.css

636 ms

a5176ab43b1923cf.css

688 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Pochtabank.ru, 86% (55 requests) were made to Cdn.pochtabank.w6p.ru and 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.pochtabank.w6p.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 443.1 kB (88%)

Content Size

501.2 kB

After Optimization

58.1 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Pochtabank.ru main page is 501.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 501.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 443.1 kB

  • Original 501.2 kB
  • After minification 501.2 kB
  • After compression 58.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 443.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (92%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pochtabank. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pochtabank.ru

pochtabank.ru

375 ms

www.pochtabank.ru

www.pochtabank.ru

971 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

61 ms

168ff4dd899909b1.css

168ff4dd899909b1.css

636 ms

a5176ab43b1923cf.css

a5176ab43b1923cf.css

688 ms

d315e8fc2b7bc9f3.css

d315e8fc2b7bc9f3.css

740 ms

c1b00d5deb14793b.css

c1b00d5deb14793b.css

754 ms

607e1f022abadfc3.css

607e1f022abadfc3.css

1392 ms

4b08d642ed7e0495.css

4b08d642ed7e0495.css

741 ms

e44d61c8588c6a04.css

e44d61c8588c6a04.css

1051 ms

fedfc94a2e965fc5.css

fedfc94a2e965fc5.css

745 ms

c37439285d57dcea.css

c37439285d57dcea.css

768 ms

93b66b918acfae9b.css

93b66b918acfae9b.css

761 ms

b32d10c5f1acde34.css

b32d10c5f1acde34.css

765 ms

7fdc2c25603b3bc0.css

7fdc2c25603b3bc0.css

1179 ms

fad19ecd0baf9f52.css

fad19ecd0baf9f52.css

769 ms

6784496378812d60.css

6784496378812d60.css

779 ms

5f3b9c5cd031506e.css

5f3b9c5cd031506e.css

773 ms

8d94c8c7a20b883b.css

8d94c8c7a20b883b.css

781 ms

3c7ad31b0c3f35f0.css

3c7ad31b0c3f35f0.css

827 ms

7186243bab499a53.css

7186243bab499a53.css

824 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

784 ms

6838.eb03314b254b3502.js

6838.eb03314b254b3502.js

829 ms

commons-2f8fc41f262447e3.js

commons-2f8fc41f262447e3.js

833 ms

9735.2efd803f6b9c25ea.js

9735.2efd803f6b9c25ea.js

830 ms

8172.50d8bf5ba8ff8aa3.js

8172.50d8bf5ba8ff8aa3.js

841 ms

5760.54390b5519545808.js

5760.54390b5519545808.js

842 ms

7042.f8a94651494e171c.js

7042.f8a94651494e171c.js

841 ms

2521.23f17610d29579de.js

2521.23f17610d29579de.js

845 ms

6914.5bdcb58e7538001b.js

6914.5bdcb58e7538001b.js

841 ms

9568.f722c836ee6f2660.js

9568.f722c836ee6f2660.js

839 ms

7861.88b89deb4d7ede93.js

7861.88b89deb4d7ede93.js

843 ms

905.f7123373ae8be3bd.js

905.f7123373ae8be3bd.js

843 ms

2991.b76784b7e563f064.js

2991.b76784b7e563f064.js

842 ms

1294.a7dbe66159a2f9fd.js

1294.a7dbe66159a2f9fd.js

847 ms

8094.0a67e4a4318ce8b2.js

8094.0a67e4a4318ce8b2.js

848 ms

2298.cabe4d015c58babc.js

2298.cabe4d015c58babc.js

846 ms

8843.07f10ebdcd0cb41c.js

8843.07f10ebdcd0cb41c.js

866 ms

7273.1ceeec92d7eefdb3.js

7273.1ceeec92d7eefdb3.js

850 ms

4709.e61bdb39eae92506.js

4709.e61bdb39eae92506.js

209 ms

7796.58d732eb6f9d69fc.js

7796.58d732eb6f9d69fc.js

145 ms

webpack-cf190d21ee8f5789.js

webpack-cf190d21ee8f5789.js

147 ms

framework-09f3afa64952aba4.js

framework-09f3afa64952aba4.js

139 ms

main-fd9305bb08ecd083.js

main-fd9305bb08ecd083.js

155 ms

_app-5e5df24de17524bb.js

_app-5e5df24de17524bb.js

171 ms

598-da00f1c13bcf3c63.js

598-da00f1c13bcf3c63.js

166 ms

2792-6b446e8d23dd6091.js

2792-6b446e8d23dd6091.js

184 ms

7804-a2db70ed8b827642.js

7804-a2db70ed8b827642.js

185 ms

3299-58ab3c7537b95411.js

3299-58ab3c7537b95411.js

178 ms

%5B%5B...slug%5D%5D-5bff396028677862.js

%5B%5B...slug%5D%5D-5bff396028677862.js

201 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

200 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

160 ms

_middlewareManifest.js

_middlewareManifest.js

160 ms

image

image

761 ms

image

image

850 ms

image

image

850 ms

image

image

1133 ms

image-mask.f8337d99.svg

image-mask.f8337d99.svg

205 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

201 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff

201 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff

202 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff

199 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

199 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff

202 ms

Accessibility Review

pochtabank.ru accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

pochtabank.ru best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pochtabank.ru SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pochtabank.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pochtabank.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pochtabank.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pochtabank. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: