3.5 sec in total
661 ms
2.3 sec
499 ms
Visit pointmap.com now to see the best up-to-date Pointmap content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pointmap.com
Drafting and Technical Mapping | Pointmap | CAD - GIS Solutions
Visit pointmap.comWe analyzed Pointmap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 661 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pointmap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value3,640 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value23.4 s
1/100
10%
661 ms
45 ms
85 ms
127 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Pointmap.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (857 ms) belongs to the original domain Pointmap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 452.6 kB (14%)
3.2 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Pointmap.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pointmap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 289.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.8 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pointmap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (79%)
67
14
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pointmap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pointmap.com
661 ms
js
45 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
85 ms
all.min.css
127 ms
extra.min.css
86 ms
style.css
82 ms
style.min.css
146 ms
classic-themes.min.css
96 ms
frontend.css
111 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
121 ms
font-awesome.min.css
131 ms
styles.css
142 ms
frontend.css
166 ms
page-list.css
163 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.css
172 ms
frontend.css
181 ms
dashicons.min.css
242 ms
css
24 ms
pointmap.com
583 ms
css
43 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
212 ms
jquery.min.js
260 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
226 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
231 ms
frontend.js
251 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
264 ms
frontend.min.js
273 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
285 ms
responsive-menu.js
301 ms
js
62 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
308 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
311 ms
index.js
308 ms
index.js
331 ms
api.js
53 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
361 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
364 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
358 ms
index.js
348 ms
v4-shims.js
52 ms
all.js
95 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
410 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
392 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
397 ms
vimeo.min.js
329 ms
analytics.js
113 ms
cropped-cropped-cropped-Screenshot.png
725 ms
Image_from_Skype1.jpg
856 ms
IMG_1621.jpg
857 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-12-11-at-5.52.15-PM.png
393 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-12-11-at-5.52.07-PM.png
392 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-12-11-at-5.51.58-PM.png
392 ms
recaptcha__en.js
129 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
81 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
82 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
156 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
89 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
156 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
294 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
296 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
84 ms
collect
52 ms
player_api
120 ms
bx_loader.gif
125 ms
mejs-controls.svg
124 ms
js
128 ms
www-widgetapi.js
5 ms
qe9uXmnZAZM
97 ms
js
60 ms
www-player.css
18 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
base.js
121 ms
collect
374 ms
ad_status.js
170 ms
62mh7a0fQTK9Uep7g0y3snI_COPB4Zut5ZKHWl7ffDc.js
68 ms
embed.js
33 ms
id
39 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
124 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
126 ms
pointmap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
pointmap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pointmap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pointmap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pointmap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pointmap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pointmap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: