13 sec in total
4.8 sec
8 sec
260 ms
Visit polteq.com now to see the best up-to-date Polteq content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polteq.com
Verhogen van software kwaliteit, dat is wat Polteq als specialist in software testen al meer dan 20 jaar doet.
Visit polteq.comWe analyzed Polteq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.8 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
polteq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value6,130 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value24.0 s
1/100
10%
4793 ms
265 ms
175 ms
176 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Polteq.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Polteq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 436.1 kB (31%)
1.4 MB
972.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Polteq.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 893.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polteq images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 239.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 239.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polteq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (52%)
54
26
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polteq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.polteq.com
4793 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
265 ms
twitter-feed.css
175 ms
cookie-compliance.css
176 ms
better-related.css
179 ms
wpgmza_style.css
182 ms
jquery.js
422 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
262 ms
cookie-compliance.min.js
265 ms
royalslider.css
265 ms
minimal.css
266 ms
language-selector.css
348 ms
loader.css
284 ms
modernizr-2.5.3.min.js
294 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
42 ms
js
26 ms
jquery.royal-slider.min.js
292 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
202 ms
plugins.js
291 ms
script.js
292 ms
jquery.validate.js
377 ms
jquery.cslider.js
354 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
371 ms
bootstrap.min.js
372 ms
sitepress.js
374 ms
reset.css
88 ms
base.min.css
157 ms
wordpress.css
170 ms
slider.css
173 ms
print.css
176 ms
logo@2x.png
115 ms
sprite.png
357 ms
submenutop.png
115 ms
slider.png
114 ms
slider_lines.png
115 ms
DSC_0661.png
746 ms
DSC_0412.png
1009 ms
DSC_0847.png
1441 ms
Jos-en-Anja-vrijstaand.png
1359 ms
DSC_0581-472x154.png
1487 ms
DSC_0336-vrij.png
1449 ms
DSC_0965-copy.png
1278 ms
DSC_0532.png
1188 ms
Software-testen-specialist-in-software-testen-hoofdkantoor-Polteq-Amersfoort-Leaders-in-software-testing1.png
1366 ms
home1.jpg
1454 ms
home3-210x100.jpg
1446 ms
home2.jpg
1457 ms
Homepage-banner-Aviodrome-14-mei-20161.jpg
1702 ms
right.png
102 ms
tab-arrow.png
204 ms
neem-contact-op.png
202 ms
cordia.woff
468 ms
kalinga.woff
602 ms
analytics.js
93 ms
controls-sprite.png
89 ms
polteq.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
polteq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
polteq.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polteq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polteq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polteq.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polteq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: