Tools & Wizards About Us
polygraphproject.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

polygraphproject.eu

This domain has been registered for a customer by nicsell

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

774 ms

polygraphproject.eu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Polygraphproject content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polygraphproject.eu

This domain polygraphproject.eu was registered successfully by nicsell due to a customer order and will be moved soon.

Visit polygraphproject.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Polygraphproject.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polygraphproject.eu performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.454

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polygraphproject.eu

1661 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

171 ms

style.min.css

209 ms

wpautoterms.css

175 ms

front.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Polygraphproject.eu, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Polygraphproject.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

302.6 kB

After Optimization

202.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Polygraphproject.eu main page is 302.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 107.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 86.8 kB

  • Original 107.3 kB
  • After minification 99.5 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 106.1 kB
  • After minification 106.1 kB
  • After compression 99.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 89.2 kB
  • After minification 89.2 kB
  • After compression 83.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polygraphproject.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (89%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polygraphproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

polygraphproject.eu

polygraphproject.eu

1661 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

171 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

209 ms

wpautoterms.css

wpautoterms.css

175 ms

front.css

front.css

182 ms

css

css

19 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

288 ms

style.css

style.css

192 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

337 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

343 ms

colorbox.min.css

colorbox.min.css

348 ms

blocks.min.css

blocks.min.css

359 ms

style.css

style.css

449 ms

public.css

public.css

492 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

593 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

508 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

522 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

528 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

682 ms

base.js

base.js

667 ms

front.js

front.js

685 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

982 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

980 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

983 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

680 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1041 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1097 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

1040 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1096 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1096 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

1097 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

1097 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1238 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1273 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

1274 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

1275 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1276 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

1273 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

1186 ms

wpforms.js

wpforms.js

1298 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

638 ms

Step_4_of_4__Sav__1_-removebg-preview.png

Step_4_of_4__Sav__1_-removebg-preview.png

330 ms

247-Featured-Image-87-scaled-1.jpg

247-Featured-Image-87-scaled-1.jpg

332 ms

pharmacist_smiles.jpg

pharmacist_smiles.jpg

332 ms

KV.jpg

KV.jpg

331 ms

247-Featured-Image-87-scaled-1-150x150.jpg

247-Featured-Image-87-scaled-1-150x150.jpg

332 ms

pharmacist_smiles-150x150.jpg

pharmacist_smiles-150x150.jpg

332 ms

KV-150x150.jpg

KV-150x150.jpg

332 ms

SpartanNash-pharmacist-819x1024-1.jpg

SpartanNash-pharmacist-819x1024-1.jpg

328 ms

UK-pharmacist-working-with-nurse.jpg

UK-pharmacist-working-with-nurse.jpg

327 ms

submit-spin.svg

submit-spin.svg

621 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

45 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

34 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

34 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

37 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

35 ms

kf-icons.woff

kf-icons.woff

517 ms

ssb-icon.ttf

ssb-icon.ttf

318 ms

invisible.js

invisible.js

114 ms

247-Featured-Image-87-scaled-1.jpg

247-Featured-Image-87-scaled-1.jpg

2229 ms

pharmacist_smiles.jpg

pharmacist_smiles.jpg

2229 ms

KV.jpg

KV.jpg

2228 ms

player_api

player_api

1078 ms

mejs-controls.svg

mejs-controls.svg

974 ms

Accessibility Review

polygraphproject.eu accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

polygraphproject.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

polygraphproject.eu SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polygraphproject.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polygraphproject.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

polygraphproject.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Polygraphproject. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: