3.2 sec in total
280 ms
2.6 sec
359 ms
Click here to check amazing Polymar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polymar.com
Polymar markets a unique range of specially formulated light stable polyurethane sheet and films for the glass laminating industry
Visit polymar.comWe analyzed Polymar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
polymar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value16.7 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.318
36/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
280 ms
733 ms
182 ms
261 ms
266 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Polymar.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) belongs to the original domain Polymar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 67.2 kB (3%)
2.4 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Polymar.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.0 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polymar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polymar.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (74%)
42
11
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polymar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polymar.com
280 ms
733 ms
index.php
182 ms
modal.css
261 ms
attachments_hide.css
266 ms
attachments_list.css
267 ms
nucleus.css
270 ms
galatea_10.css
378 ms
bootstrap-gantry.css
388 ms
joomla.css
347 ms
icomoon.css
355 ms
font-awesome.min.css
357 ms
galatea-joomla_10.css
359 ms
custom_10.css
433 ms
demo.css
442 ms
animate.css
449 ms
squeezebox.css
443 ms
mootools-core.js
482 ms
core.js
474 ms
mootools-more.js
718 ms
modal.js
531 ms
jquery.min.js
628 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
536 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
567 ms
attachments_refresh.js
574 ms
caption.js
619 ms
bootstrap.min.js
628 ms
js
56 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
662 ms
squeezebox.min.js
667 ms
main.js
881 ms
owlcarousel.js
880 ms
mosaicgrid.js
880 ms
head1_1920x130.png
228 ms
Polymar_logo_100H.png
101 ms
building1w_1920x800.jpg
354 ms
airbus_v2_1920x800.jpg
282 ms
Humvee_w.jpg
347 ms
building1H_1920x800.jpg
468 ms
Humvee.jpg
554 ms
EdgeSeal_v3.jpg
724 ms
Polyflex_logo.jpg
375 ms
js
72 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
muli-regular-webfont.woff
316 ms
muli-light-webfont.woff
326 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
354 ms
collect
14 ms
polymar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
polymar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
polymar.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polymar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polymar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polymar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polymar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: