Tools & Wizards About Us
polyprojects.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

polyprojects.in

9959890058 Tensile Structure Manufacturers in Hyderabad, Polycarbonate Sheet Manufacturers in Hyderabad, Galvanized Iron Sheet Manufacturers in Hydera...

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

558 ms

polyprojects.in screenshot

About Website

Visit polyprojects.in now to see the best up-to-date Polyprojects content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polyprojects.in

Tensile Structure, Polycarbonate Sheet, Galvanized Iron Sheet, Epdm Rubber Gasket, Silicone Sealant, Self Drill Screws, Car Parking Sheds, Canopy Carbonate Sheets, SkyLight Duct Cover Sheet, Swimming ...

Visit polyprojects.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Polyprojects.in page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polyprojects.in performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polyprojects.in

179 ms

polyprojects.in

292 ms

www.polyprojects.in

157 ms

www.polyprojects.in

379 ms

gtm.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Polyprojects.in, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Polyprojects.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.0 kB (6%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Polyprojects.in main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 25.3 kB
  • After minification 19.9 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 226.7 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polyprojects images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 102.5 kB
  • After minification 102.5 kB
  • After compression 79.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 79.6 kB
  • After minification 79.6 kB
  • After compression 55.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polyprojects.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polyprojects. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

polyprojects.in

polyprojects.in

179 ms

polyprojects.in

polyprojects.in

292 ms

www.polyprojects.in

www.polyprojects.in

157 ms

www.polyprojects.in

www.polyprojects.in

379 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

63 ms

js

js

120 ms

vendor.bundle.css

vendor.bundle.css

287 ms

style62ea.css

style62ea.css

331 ms

logo.png

logo.png

353 ms

Tensile-Fabric4.jpg

Tensile-Fabric4.jpg

551 ms

polycarbonate-roofing.jpg

polycarbonate-roofing.jpg

810 ms

Galvanized5.jpg

Galvanized5.jpg

810 ms

upvc-home.jpg

upvc-home.jpg

592 ms

puf-home.jpg

puf-home.jpg

624 ms

car-parking8.jpg

car-parking8.jpg

680 ms

jquery.bundle.js

jquery.bundle.js

725 ms

script.js

script.js

751 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

901 ms

polly69.jpg

polly69.jpg

912 ms

polly30.jpg

polly30.jpg

1034 ms

polly2.jpg

polly2.jpg

933 ms

polly1.jpg

polly1.jpg

1032 ms

polly42.jpg

polly42.jpg

968 ms

logo-22.png

logo-22.png

990 ms

fb.png

fb.png

1001 ms

insta.png

insta.png

1027 ms

yt.png

yt.png

1070 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

1074 ms

call.png

call.png

1076 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

1137 ms

banner-2.jpg

banner-2.jpg

1124 ms

banner-3.jpg

banner-3.jpg

1142 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

871 ms

get-in-bg.jpg

get-in-bg.jpg

831 ms

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

690 ms

roboto-light-webfont.woff

roboto-light-webfont.woff

798 ms

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

813 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

836 ms

poppins-semibold-webfont.woff

poppins-semibold-webfont.woff

844 ms

poppins-bold-webfont.woff

poppins-bold-webfont.woff

843 ms

poppins-regular-webfont.woff

poppins-regular-webfont.woff

843 ms

poppins-light-webfont.woff

poppins-light-webfont.woff

957 ms

arrow-prev-g.png

arrow-prev-g.png

663 ms

arrow-next-g.png

arrow-next-g.png

724 ms

Accessibility Review

polyprojects.in accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

polyprojects.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

polyprojects.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polyprojects.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polyprojects.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

polyprojects.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polyprojects. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: