Tools & Wizards About Us
polywebtech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

polywebtech.com

Web Design & Development - Complete Branding Solution

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

693 ms

polywebtech.com screenshot

About Website

Visit polywebtech.com now to see the best up-to-date Poly Web Tech content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polywebtech.com

Empower Your Business with On-Demand Branding & Web Designing Services. Logo, Website Development, Video Animation, Brand Identity – Covers Everything!

Visit polywebtech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Polywebtech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polywebtech.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.268

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polywebtech.com

51 ms

polywebtech.com

303 ms

bootstrap.min.css

22 ms

style.css

28 ms

responsive.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Polywebtech.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (348 ms) relates to the external source Embed.tawk.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.1 kB (27%)

Content Size

443.9 kB

After Optimization

325.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Polywebtech.com main page is 443.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 242.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 107.6 kB

  • Original 123.6 kB
  • After minification 123.6 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 28.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Poly Web Tech images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 242.7 kB
  • After minification 242.7 kB
  • After compression 232.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 597 B

  • Original 49.2 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 48.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polywebtech.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (63%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Poly Web Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

polywebtech.com

polywebtech.com

51 ms

polywebtech.com

polywebtech.com

303 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

22 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

54 ms

js

js

42 ms

tes-1.png

tes-1.png

26 ms

tes-2.png

tes-2.png

29 ms

tes-3.png

tes-3.png

31 ms

tes-4.png

tes-4.png

33 ms

tes-5.png

tes-5.png

35 ms

tes-6.png

tes-6.png

38 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

48 ms

home-web-banner.webp

home-web-banner.webp

26 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

25 ms

our-combo.webp

our-combo.webp

26 ms

moneyback.png

moneyback.png

24 ms

our_testimonial.webp

our_testimonial.webp

27 ms

footer-vectox.png

footer-vectox.png

25 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

7 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

24 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

39 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

38 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

143 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

41 ms

cycle.js

cycle.js

41 ms

owl-casrousel.js

owl-casrousel.js

49 ms

jquery.slimscroll.min.js

jquery.slimscroll.min.js

46 ms

fancybox.js

fancybox.js

45 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

47 ms

script.js

script.js

47 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

59 ms

21990860.js

21990860.js

141 ms

fontawesome-oswald.css

fontawesome-oswald.css

14 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

12 ms

fontawesome-poppins.css

fontawesome-poppins.css

15 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

16 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

13 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

26 ms

owl-carousel.css

owl-carousel.css

18 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

11 ms

us-flag.webp

us-flag.webp

10 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

151 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

196 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

195 ms

default

default

348 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

303 ms

banner.js

banner.js

242 ms

fb.js

fb.js

237 ms

21990860.js

21990860.js

238 ms

arrow-prev.png

arrow-prev.png

93 ms

arrow-next.png

arrow-next.png

33 ms

Accessibility Review

polywebtech.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

polywebtech.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

polywebtech.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polywebtech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polywebtech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

polywebtech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Poly Web Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: