4 sec in total
164 ms
2.6 sec
1.2 sec
Visit poolcleanerblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Poolcleanerblog content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about poolcleanerblog.com
Visit poolcleanerblog.comWe analyzed Poolcleanerblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
poolcleanerblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value1,810 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.236
53/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
164 ms
410 ms
376 ms
52 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Poolcleanerblog.com, 42% (15 requests) were made to Images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Poolcleanerblog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 85.4 kB (26%)
334.8 kB
249.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Poolcleanerblog.com main page is 334.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 219.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Poolcleanerblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 246 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (24%)
25
19
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Poolcleanerblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
poolcleanerblog.com
164 ms
poolcleanerblog.com
410 ms
jquery.js
376 ms
onejs
52 ms
q
39 ms
lazyload.min.js
225 ms
33dad25fdf858eaeadd0753d4f66059b.js
1426 ms
logo-2-3-1.png
1226 ms
009883fb377b9bbdf15067cc9e802db3.css
1162 ms
css
65 ms
getad
149 ms
getad
141 ms
61WX4mL%2Bm7L._SL250_.jpg
241 ms
51GRpOfrWBL._SL250_.jpg
246 ms
518puAfVNBL._SL250_.jpg
245 ms
61TTB3%2B1srL._SL250_.jpg
428 ms
61mToIavs-L._SL250_.jpg
246 ms
71u80OuhzuL._SL250_.jpg
249 ms
71c9yCP9N3L._SL250_.jpg
250 ms
81UiA6OoDUL._SL250_.jpg
253 ms
511ZYZ9E2nL._SL250_.jpg
252 ms
71PETUTLDQL._SL250_.jpg
250 ms
61UanAAWxZL._SL250_.jpg
256 ms
61FXrcaK-FL._SL250_.jpg
257 ms
61SoJe3kvGL._SL250_.jpg
259 ms
61bfTT5ToWL._SL250_.jpg
259 ms
61XjWFpajGL._SL250_.jpg
260 ms
Automatic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
466 ms
q
37 ms
9 ms
www.poolcleanerblog.com
441 ms
www.poolcleanerblog.com
313 ms
www.poolcleanerblog.com
328 ms
swimmingpooldaily.com
120 ms
swimmingpooldaily.com
33 ms
swimmingpooldaily.com
17 ms
poolcleanerblog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
poolcleanerblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
poolcleanerblog.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Poolcleanerblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Poolcleanerblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
poolcleanerblog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Poolcleanerblog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: