Tools & Wizards About Us
poolfillincompany.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

poolfillincompany.com

Pool Fill In and Removal Company

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

218 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

285 ms

poolfillincompany.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pool Fill In Company content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about poolfillincompany.com

For more than three decades, we have established clients we call friends who can vouch for our professionalism in terms of servicing your in-ground pool fill in and above ground pool fill in. For this...

Visit poolfillincompany.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Poolfillincompany.com page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

poolfillincompany.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,730 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.113

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.poolfillincompany.com

218 ms

autoptimize_bbd0c67ec3b49eec49278bb58a9f3db1.css

80 ms

autoptimize_3ede89c9e2c25b6007a99a26e6c22f58.css

55 ms

easy_rotator.min.js

117 ms

autoptimize_092475066d7d7569d8542f5db3758736.js

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Poolfillincompany.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Easyrotator.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (324 ms) belongs to the original domain Poolfillincompany.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.3 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Poolfillincompany.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 248.2 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pool Fill In Company needs image optimization as it can save up to 248.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 158.8 kB

  • Original 242.2 kB
  • After minification 242.1 kB
  • After compression 83.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 58.1 kB

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Poolfillincompany.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pool Fill In Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.poolfillincompany.com

www.poolfillincompany.com

218 ms

autoptimize_bbd0c67ec3b49eec49278bb58a9f3db1.css

autoptimize_bbd0c67ec3b49eec49278bb58a9f3db1.css

80 ms

autoptimize_3ede89c9e2c25b6007a99a26e6c22f58.css

autoptimize_3ede89c9e2c25b6007a99a26e6c22f58.css

55 ms

easy_rotator.min.js

easy_rotator.min.js

117 ms

autoptimize_092475066d7d7569d8542f5db3758736.js

autoptimize_092475066d7d7569d8542f5db3758736.js

108 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

115 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

98 ms

play20_14_black.png

play20_14_black.png

95 ms

pause20_14_black.png

pause20_14_black.png

51 ms

page.png

page.png

324 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

63 ms

set1-0.jpg

set1-0.jpg

64 ms

set2-0.jpg

set2-0.jpg

84 ms

set3-0.jpg

set3-0.jpg

134 ms

set4-0.jpg

set4-0.jpg

110 ms

book-appt-300x60.png

book-appt-300x60.png

83 ms

rss_32.png

rss_32.png

85 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

Accessibility Review

poolfillincompany.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

poolfillincompany.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

poolfillincompany.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Poolfillincompany.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Poolfillincompany.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

poolfillincompany.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pool Fill In Company. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: