Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

poolpump.reviews

Top 10 BEST Pool Pump Reviews (Reviewed by an Industry Expert)

Page Load Speed

37.6 sec in total

First Response

299 ms

Resources Loaded

22.3 sec

Page Rendered

15 sec

poolpump.reviews screenshot

About Website

Visit poolpump.reviews now to see the best up-to-date Pool Pump content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about poolpump.reviews

Pool pump reviews are great if you want to get the most from your money. Click here to read about the 10 best pool pumps on the market.

Visit poolpump.reviews

Key Findings

We analyzed Poolpump.reviews page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 37.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 9 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

poolpump.reviews performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,360 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

poolpump.reviews

299 ms

poolpump.reviews

1806 ms

js

122 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

223 ms

hover-min.css

341 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Poolpump.reviews, 15% (16 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 605.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

646.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Poolpump.reviews main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 455.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 214.1 kB

  • Original 269.7 kB
  • After minification 257.3 kB
  • After compression 55.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 273.8 kB
  • After minification 255.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pool Pump images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 252.6 kB
  • After minification 252.6 kB
  • After compression 213.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 333.6 kB

  • Original 455.0 kB
  • After minification 454.8 kB
  • After compression 121.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Poolpump.reviews needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 333.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (56%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pool Pump. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

poolpump.reviews accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

poolpump.reviews best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

poolpump.reviews SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Poolpump.reviews can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Poolpump.reviews main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pool Pump. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: