2.2 sec in total
9 ms
550 ms
1.6 sec
Visit portablesoup.blog now to see the best up-to-date Portable Soup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about portablesoup.blog
“We live not for today, but for the ages yet to come, and the children yet unborn.” — Mary Harris (Mother) Jones
Visit portablesoup.blogWe analyzed Portablesoup.blog page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
portablesoup.blog performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.179
67/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
9 ms
23 ms
71 ms
73 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Portablesoup.blog, 45% (23 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 18% (9 requests) were made to Portablesoup.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (324 ms) relates to the external source Portablesoup.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 124.5 kB (16%)
760.6 kB
636.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Portablesoup.blog main page is 760.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 492.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Portable Soup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 703 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 338 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Portablesoup.blog has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (67%)
45
15
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Portable Soup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
portablesoup.blog
9 ms
portablesoup.wordpress.com
23 ms
webfont.js
71 ms
infinity.css
73 ms
style.css
102 ms
96 ms
96 ms
107 ms
style.css
104 ms
106 ms
global.css
106 ms
108 ms
hovercards.min.js
103 ms
wpgroho.js
104 ms
112 ms
96 ms
w.js
105 ms
css
60 ms
global-print.css
1 ms
main-before.png
84 ms
cropped-bookshavewings.jpg
99 ms
594584146f518b00efdd535a33ac14b4735f59ed664282e54b39eb29c9f51abf
180 ms
g.gif
122 ms
reykjavik.jpg
196 ms
when-im-dead.jpg
150 ms
night-house.jpeg
195 ms
franklin-motionaction.jpg
211 ms
hen_with_kits.jpg
196 ms
puppy-and-cat-links.jpg
171 ms
image-1.png
324 ms
siteDescription.png
85 ms
main-title.png
85 ms
folder.gif
85 ms
bubble.gif
85 ms
tag.gif
84 ms
sprite.png
84 ms
sidebar-title.jpg
107 ms
file-sidebar.gif
107 ms
clock-sidebar.gif
107 ms
folder-sidebar.gif
107 ms
arrow-sidebar.gif
107 ms
left-post-navigation-body.png
107 ms
zig-zag.png
119 ms
g.gif
119 ms
g.gif
118 ms
ga6saw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIMZhhWnFTyNZIQD1-_FXP0RgnaOg9MYBOshPcGrq0.woff
59 ms
kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNXaxU.woff
63 ms
kmKiZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qviTgY5KcY.woff
63 ms
kmKhZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNcWx8QCg.woff
62 ms
actionbar.css
1 ms
actionbar.js
19 ms
portablesoup.blog accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
portablesoup.blog best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
portablesoup.blog SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portablesoup.blog can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Portablesoup.blog main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
portablesoup.blog
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Portable Soup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: