Tools & Wizards About Us
portafilter.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

portafilter.net

Portafilter - Learn How to Brew the Perfect Coffee ☕

Page Load Speed

23.1 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

21.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

portafilter.net screenshot

About Website

Visit portafilter.net now to see the best up-to-date Portafilter content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about portafilter.net

Portafilter talks about everything related to coffee including the best coffee beans, brewing methods, coffee makers. Reviews and guides straight from the pros!

Visit portafilter.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Portafilter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 23 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

portafilter.net performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

portafilter.net

177 ms

cash.js

102 ms

style.css

12 ms

js

402 ms

frontend.js

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Portafilter.net, 32% (13 requests) were made to Sync.go.sonobi.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Ssl-market-east.smrtb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.8 kB (45%)

Content Size

133.0 kB

After Optimization

73.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Portafilter.net main page is 133.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 80.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 59.5 kB

  • Original 80.5 kB
  • After minification 80.5 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 310 B

  • Original 49.9 kB
  • After minification 49.9 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 16 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Portafilter.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (81%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Portafilter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

portafilter.net

portafilter.net

177 ms

cash.js

cash.js

102 ms

style.css

style.css

12 ms

js

js

402 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

23 ms

lasso-ga.js

lasso-ga.js

78 ms

uc.js

uc.js

491 ms

fads.js

fads.js

391 ms

banger.js

banger.js

389 ms

cmbv2.js

cmbv2.js

384 ms

houston.js

houston.js

364 ms

invisible.js

invisible.js

362 ms

Portafilter-Site-Logo.svg

Portafilter-Site-Logo.svg

362 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

2302 ms

nmash2.js

nmash2.js

2171 ms

cmbdv2.js

cmbdv2.js

2164 ms

pixel

pixel

2444 ms

30907

30907

2493 ms

setuid

setuid

2433 ms

match

match

2393 ms

all

all

20459 ms

75128d0edb7d7fe7

75128d0edb7d7fe7

248 ms

collect

collect

141 ms

us.gif

us.gif

151 ms

us.gif

us.gif

123 ms

us.gif

us.gif

150 ms

pixel

pixel

108 ms

us.gif

us.gif

156 ms

info2

info2

125 ms

demconf.jpg

demconf.jpg

94 ms

us.gif

us.gif

80 ms

usg.gif

usg.gif

86 ms

us.gif

us.gif

74 ms

pixel

pixel

90 ms

pixel

pixel

132 ms

us.gif

us.gif

65 ms

us.gif

us.gif

59 ms

us.gif

us.gif

19 ms

us.gif

us.gif

18 ms

us.gif

us.gif

11 ms

dall.js

dall.js

271 ms

Accessibility Review

portafilter.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

portafilter.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

portafilter.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portafilter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Portafilter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

portafilter.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Portafilter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: