Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

portercalls.com

Welcome to Porter Custom Calls

Page Load Speed

790 ms in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

367 ms

Page Rendered

267 ms

portercalls.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Porter Calls content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about portercalls.com

Visit portercalls.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Portercalls.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 634 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

portercalls.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

portercalls.com

156 ms

corbkgnd.gif

44 ms

PorterSiteLogo2-test.jpg

129 ms

home_cmp_corporat010_vbtn_p.gif

44 ms

home_cmp_corporat010_vbtn_a.gif

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Portercalls.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (184 ms) belongs to the original domain Portercalls.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

116.2 kB

After Optimization

86.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Portercalls.com main page is 116.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 94.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 94.7 kB
  • After minification 82.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Porter Calls needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (83%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Porter Calls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

portercalls.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

portercalls.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

portercalls.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portercalls.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Portercalls.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Porter Calls. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: