Tools & Wizards About Us
porterinsulation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

porterinsulation.com

Home - Porter Insulation

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

249 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

187 ms

porterinsulation.com screenshot

About Website

Visit porterinsulation.com now to see the best up-to-date Porter Insulation content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about porterinsulation.com

Visit porterinsulation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Porterinsulation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

porterinsulation.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value30.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

porterinsulation.com

249 ms

css2

31 ms

style.min.css

20 ms

style.min.css

56 ms

accordion.min.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Porterinsulation.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (449 ms) belongs to the original domain Porterinsulation.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

820.3 kB

After Optimization

765.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Porterinsulation.com main page is 820.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 501.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 43.0 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 501.3 kB
  • After minification 501.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Porter Insulation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 551 B

  • Original 94.3 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 93.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 178.9 kB
  • After minification 178.9 kB
  • After compression 162.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Porterinsulation.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (70%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Porter Insulation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

porterinsulation.com

porterinsulation.com

249 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

20 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

56 ms

accordion.min.css

accordion.min.css

34 ms

cta.min.css

cta.min.css

39 ms

hero.min.css

hero.min.css

76 ms

logo-slider.min.css

logo-slider.min.css

42 ms

multi-columns.min.css

multi-columns.min.css

47 ms

one-column.min.css

one-column.min.css

85 ms

products.min.css

products.min.css

79 ms

side-by-side.min.css

side-by-side.min.css

88 ms

testimonial.min.css

testimonial.min.css

92 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

106 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

115 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

117 ms

acf.min.js

acf.min.js

119 ms

hero-slider.min.js

hero-slider.min.js

120 ms

logo-slider.min.js

logo-slider.min.js

119 ms

testimonial-slider.min.js

testimonial-slider.min.js

119 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

119 ms

post-filter.min.js

post-filter.min.js

120 ms

product-filter.min.js

product-filter.min.js

119 ms

modernizr-build.js

modernizr-build.js

140 ms

inview.min.js

inview.min.js

139 ms

sidr.min.js

sidr.min.js

138 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

147 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

139 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

149 ms

aos.min.js

aos.min.js

151 ms

object-fit.min.js

object-fit.min.js

153 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

175 ms

preload.min.js

preload.min.js

152 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

153 ms

logo.png

logo.png

105 ms

baby-chicks-e1702053539881.png

baby-chicks-e1702053539881.png

154 ms

gettyimages-1422600410-170667a.jpg

gettyimages-1422600410-170667a.jpg

22 ms

button-arrow.svg

button-arrow.svg

103 ms

certainteed-logo-2016-1-1.jpeg

certainteed-logo-2016-1-1.jpeg

22 ms

owenscorning_logo-1-1.png

owenscorning_logo-1-1.png

106 ms

JM-1.jpeg

JM-1.jpeg

42 ms

701-Chicken-House-pic2-1.jpeg

701-Chicken-House-pic2-1.jpeg

105 ms

font

font

20 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

48 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

330 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

388 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

449 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

111 ms

font

font

14 ms

Accessibility Review

porterinsulation.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

porterinsulation.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

porterinsulation.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Porterinsulation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Porterinsulation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

porterinsulation.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Porter Insulation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: