Tools & Wizards About Us
portfever.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

portfever.com

Port Fever - Cruise Port Webcam Archive

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

123 ms

portfever.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Port Fever content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about portfever.com

Port Fever provides live video, image capture and archive from a variety of cruise-related webcams. Watch cruise ships, freighters, mega-yachts and sailboats or just checkout the weather. Visit the ar...

Visit portfever.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Portfever.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

portfever.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,070 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

portfever.com

300 ms

menu5.css

89 ms

ga.js

15 ms

pnw_preview.jpg

303 ms

pcw_preview.jpg

303 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Portfever.com, 18% (11 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

405.4 kB

After Optimization

336.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Portfever.com main page is 405.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 307.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 47.5 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 307.7 kB
  • After minification 291.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Port Fever images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 47.3 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 38.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 672 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Portfever.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Port Fever. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

portfever.com

portfever.com

300 ms

menu5.css

menu5.css

89 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

pnw_preview.jpg

pnw_preview.jpg

303 ms

pcw_preview.jpg

pcw_preview.jpg

303 ms

main_frame3.php

main_frame3.php

85 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

105 ms

head9.png

head9.png

53 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

104 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

like.php

like.php

76 ms

like.php

like.php

260 ms

twitterFetcher_v10_min.js

twitterFetcher_v10_min.js

47 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

7 ms

vpd1GgSCNsd.css

vpd1GgSCNsd.css

364 ms

M0DWM6a_9ro.css

M0DWM6a_9ro.css

438 ms

AdP_CKHZFBh.css

AdP_CKHZFBh.css

486 ms

q68gy-v_YMF.js

q68gy-v_YMF.js

630 ms

DFmZn3_ZO2h.js

DFmZn3_ZO2h.js

486 ms

mfqI3d6rUg1.js

mfqI3d6rUg1.js

658 ms

_Qp3v7kqEMi.js

_Qp3v7kqEMi.js

651 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

198 ms

ca-pub-4810494881468391.js

ca-pub-4810494881468391.js

67 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

59 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

68 ms

tl_archive_pew.php

tl_archive_pew.php

170 ms

382669323006783488

382669323006783488

214 ms

ptztv_twitter.jpg

ptztv_twitter.jpg

112 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

1502 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

382 ms

follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

76 ms

ads

ads

169 ms

osd.js

osd.js

26 ms

ads

ads

268 ms

oasis_bg.jpg

oasis_bg.jpg

162 ms

tn00000001.jpg

tn00000001.jpg

78 ms

tn00000061.jpg

tn00000061.jpg

80 ms

tn00000121.jpg

tn00000121.jpg

109 ms

tn00000128.jpg

tn00000128.jpg

121 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

tn00000188.jpg

tn00000188.jpg

99 ms

jot

jot

125 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

38 ms

abg.js

abg.js

60 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

9 ms

favicon

favicon

80 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

78 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

30 ms

s

s

48 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

40 ms

favicon

favicon

77 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

25 ms

pmw1_preview.jpg

pmw1_preview.jpg

1032 ms

flw2_preview.jpg

flw2_preview.jpg

1032 ms

Bw8qRoQ9D-v.js

Bw8qRoQ9D-v.js

69 ms

4ylGxU24Rah.js

4ylGxU24Rah.js

204 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

3 ms

activeview

activeview

13 ms

ui

ui

32 ms

activeview

activeview

24 ms

Accessibility Review

portfever.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

portfever.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

portfever.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portfever.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Portfever.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

portfever.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Port Fever. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: