Tools & Wizards About Us
porth.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

porth.com

Porth Architects, Ltd. – Andrew Porth, AIA, LEED A.P.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

890 ms

Page Rendered

65 ms

porth.com screenshot

About Website

Visit porth.com now to see the best up-to-date Porth content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about porth.com

Visit porth.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Porth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 955 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

porth.com performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.porth.com

362 ms

css

32 ms

style.min.css

87 ms

style-index.css

68 ms

foobox.free.min.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Porth.com, 22% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) belongs to the original domain Porth.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 356.0 kB (68%)

Content Size

523.8 kB

After Optimization

167.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Porth.com main page is 523.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 221.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 37.6 kB
  • After minification 37.3 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 77.7 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Porth needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 149.8 kB

  • Original 221.9 kB
  • After minification 221.9 kB
  • After compression 72.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 157.5 kB

  • Original 186.6 kB
  • After minification 186.2 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Porth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (74%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Porth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.porth.com

www.porth.com

362 ms

css

css

32 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

87 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

68 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

73 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

90 ms

font-icons.min.css

font-icons.min.css

71 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

offside.min.css

offside.min.css

72 ms

icons.min.css

icons.min.css

88 ms

navigation-branding.min.css

navigation-branding.min.css

90 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

133 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

92 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

155 ms

offside.min.js

offside.min.js

109 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

110 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

111 ms

logo-porth.png

logo-porth.png

24 ms

home.png

home.png

49 ms

indextext.png

indextext.png

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

17 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

20 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

25 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

28 ms

generatepress.woff

generatepress.woff

25 ms

Accessibility Review

porth.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

porth.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

porth.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Porth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Porth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

porth.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Porth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: