713 ms in total
61 ms
569 ms
83 ms
Visit portingkit.com now to see the best up-to-date Porting Kit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about portingkit.com
With Porting Kit, you can install Windows games and apps on macOS easily using Wineskin technology!
Visit portingkit.comWe analyzed Portingkit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 652 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
portingkit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
61 ms
102 ms
111 ms
48 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Portingkit.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (111 ms) belongs to the original domain Portingkit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 35.3 kB (18%)
200.2 kB
164.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Portingkit.com main page is 200.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 120.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 897 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Porting Kit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Portingkit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (53%)
15
7
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Porting Kit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
portingkit.com
61 ms
portingkit.com
102 ms
www.portingkit.com
111 ms
bootstrap.min.css
48 ms
dashboard.css
62 ms
popuo-box.css
64 ms
style.css
88 ms
lodash.min.js
97 ms
angular.min.js
111 ms
restangular.min.js
85 ms
angular-route.js
81 ms
app.js
84 ms
font-awesome.min.css
110 ms
logo.png
24 ms
9.png
23 ms
lines.png
24 ms
wineskin.png
21 ms
crossover.png
20 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
69 ms
portingkit.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
portingkit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
portingkit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portingkit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Portingkit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
portingkit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Porting Kit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: