Tools & Wizards About Us
positiveimpactrating.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

positiveimpactrating.org

Join the Change! PIR 2024

Page Load Speed

19 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

18.8 sec

Page Rendered

65 ms

positiveimpactrating.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to positiveimpactrating.org homepage info - get ready to check Positiveimpactrating best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about positiveimpactrating.org

The Positive Impact Rating aims to transform business schools by defining their sustainability, moving to more collaboration and providing a tool for change. Participate now!

Visit positiveimpactrating.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Positiveimpactrating.org page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 18.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

positiveimpactrating.org performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.positiveimpactrating.org

82 ms

minified.js

53 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

50 ms

polyfill.min.js

17472 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Positiveimpactrating.org, 44% (26 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 29% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (17.5 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 710.7 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

504.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Positiveimpactrating.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 742.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 600.8 kB

  • Original 742.0 kB
  • After minification 740.4 kB
  • After compression 141.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 600.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 196.1 kB
  • After minification 145.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Positiveimpactrating needs image optimization as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 59.3 kB

  • Original 276.8 kB
  • After minification 276.8 kB
  • After compression 217.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Positiveimpactrating. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.positiveimpactrating.org

www.positiveimpactrating.org

82 ms

minified.js

minified.js

53 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

50 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

17472 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

71 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

72 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

71 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

70 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

72 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

73 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

72 ms

Logo-PIR-HOR-Text%20(1).png

Logo-PIR-HOR-Text%20(1).png

294 ms

d46c06_f1a3f172c6004f5bb9b836ce0569e582f000.jpg

d46c06_f1a3f172c6004f5bb9b836ce0569e582f000.jpg

444 ms

11062b_6bfbbc78ccf64cbd9f16ae3ebcced97d~mv2.jpg

11062b_6bfbbc78ccf64cbd9f16ae3ebcced97d~mv2.jpg

359 ms

rotating-pir-logo-white1200x800-306s_edi.png

rotating-pir-logo-white1200x800-306s_edi.png

446 ms

Blue-PRME-logo_most-recent.png

Blue-PRME-logo_most-recent.png

395 ms

GBSN.png

GBSN.png

400 ms

IBS%20logo_edited.png

IBS%20logo_edited.png

452 ms

OXFAM.png

OXFAM.png

551 ms

WWF.png

WWF.png

683 ms

VIVA.png

VIVA.png

675 ms

OIKOS.png

OIKOS.png

635 ms

SOS_primary-logo.png

SOS_primary-logo.png

610 ms

50plus20_WE_SUPPORT250.jpg

50plus20_WE_SUPPORT250.jpg

636 ms

gem_hesi.jpg

gem_hesi.jpg

742 ms

FEHR%20Advice.png

FEHR%20Advice.png

815 ms

AIESEC.png

AIESEC.png

868 ms

Global%20Compact.png

Global%20Compact.png

816 ms

Stud%20voor%20morgen_edited.png

Stud%20voor%20morgen_edited.png

844 ms

Untitled%20design.png

Untitled%20design.png

879 ms

11062b_510783dccd4c4ca19e56a6d57705a118~mv2.jpg

11062b_510783dccd4c4ca19e56a6d57705a118~mv2.jpg

970 ms

esade.png

esade.png

1006 ms

11062b_eb85a71b1a6c458fab12c11066717752~mv2.jpg

11062b_eb85a71b1a6c458fab12c11066717752~mv2.jpg

1036 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

103 ms

file.woff

file.woff

739 ms

file.woff

file.woff

718 ms

file.woff

file.woff

741 ms

file.woff

file.woff

830 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

39 ms

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

56 ms

57 ms

13 ms

14 ms

14 ms

10 ms

15 ms

59 ms

57 ms

57 ms

59 ms

60 ms

100 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

20 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

13 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

positiveimpactrating.org accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

positiveimpactrating.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

positiveimpactrating.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Positiveimpactrating.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Positiveimpactrating.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

positiveimpactrating.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Positiveimpactrating. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: