Tools & Wizards About Us
postach.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

postach.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

190 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

postach.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Postach content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about postach.com

Visit postach.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Postach.com page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

postach.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.126

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

postach.com

190 ms

jquery.min.js

72 ms

bh.php

67 ms

cf.php

123 ms

adframe.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Postach.com, 15% (4 requests) were made to T0.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) relates to the external source Dp.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

100.0 kB

After Optimization

92.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Postach.com main page is 100.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 410 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 684 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 410 B or 37% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 655 B

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Postach needs image optimization as it can save up to 655 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Postach.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (58%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Postach. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

postach.com

postach.com

190 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

72 ms

bh.php

bh.php

67 ms

cf.php

cf.php

123 ms

adframe.js

adframe.js

66 ms

master.css

master.css

68 ms

960.css

960.css

66 ms

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

29 ms

caf.js

caf.js

73 ms

caf.js

caf.js

50 ms

reset.css

reset.css

34 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

29 ms

fs_banner_grd.png

fs_banner_grd.png

68 ms

slave.html

slave.html

7 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

328 ms

chevron-white.png

chevron-white.png

30 ms

favicon

favicon

21 ms

favicon

favicon

20 ms

favicon

favicon

21 ms

favicon

favicon

20 ms

favicon

favicon

9 ms

favicon

favicon

11 ms

favicon

favicon

10 ms

favicon

favicon

10 ms

favicon

favicon

12 ms

favicon

favicon

11 ms

Accessibility Review

postach.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

postach.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

postach.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Postach.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Postach.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

postach.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Postach. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: