Tools & Wizards About Us
postalcodefinder.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

postalcodefinder.co.uk

Postcode Finder | Find Postcode | Postal Code Finder | Address Finder

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

373 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

569 ms

postalcodefinder.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit postalcodefinder.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Postal Code Finder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about postalcodefinder.co.uk

Postcode Finder or Postal Code Finder tool helps to find postcode of any UK address. Postcode finder tool can also help to search any UK address by Postcode. Find Postcode of the current location. Vie...

Visit postalcodefinder.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Postalcodefinder.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

postalcodefinder.co.uk performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

postalcodefinder.co.uk

373 ms

bootstrap.min.css

233 ms

site.css

200 ms

js

105 ms

gpt.js

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Postalcodefinder.co.uk, 24% (24 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 12% (12 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Cms.quantserve.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

346.2 kB

After Optimization

262.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Postalcodefinder.co.uk main page is 346.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 196.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 61.4 kB
  • After minification 53.1 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 674 B

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 51.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Postal Code Finder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 196.0 kB
  • After minification 196.0 kB
  • After compression 178.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 23.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Postalcodefinder.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (73%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Postal Code Finder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

postalcodefinder.co.uk

postalcodefinder.co.uk

373 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

233 ms

site.css

site.css

200 ms

js

js

105 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

88 ms

site.js

site.js

72 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

114 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

372 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

353 ms

address.js

address.js

220 ms

js

js

112 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

123 ms

pubads_impl_2022101002.js

pubads_impl_2022101002.js

128 ms

ppub_config

ppub_config

204 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

174 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

132 ms

collect

collect

85 ms

collect

collect

228 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

170 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

150 ms

ads

ads

1006 ms

ads

ads

668 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

71 ms

gen_204

gen_204

36 ms

5bbe539ad7c95ad1b7dc2874c2ab6f46.js

5bbe539ad7c95ad1b7dc2874c2ab6f46.js

53 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

88 ms

2c31c29323708f8c18cb525f4f35abd1.js

2c31c29323708f8c18cb525f4f35abd1.js

64 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

88 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

98 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

99 ms

rx_lidar.js

rx_lidar.js

98 ms

fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js

fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js

85 ms

icon.png

icon.png

196 ms

s

s

202 ms

css

css

457 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

445 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

116 ms

ads

ads

1677 ms

ads

ads

2038 ms

ads

ads

739 ms

ads

ads

2599 ms

ads

ads

2592 ms

ads

ads

1100 ms

activeview

activeview

140 ms

7JEUJG1jVChIMuhiOxVurQN9pIQLeBNKr_aiZz5iC5Y.js

7JEUJG1jVChIMuhiOxVurQN9pIQLeBNKr_aiZz5iC5Y.js

105 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff

225 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff

225 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

157 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

856 ms

cookie_push_onload.html

cookie_push_onload.html

479 ms

css2

css2

401 ms

downsize_200k_v1

downsize_200k_v1

394 ms

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

863 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

848 ms

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

835 ms

11688442032875081963

11688442032875081963

689 ms

settings_grey600_24dp.png

settings_grey600_24dp.png

688 ms

dpixel

dpixel

2675 ms

activeview

activeview

2284 ms

14763004658117789537

14763004658117789537

1800 ms

activeview

activeview

1312 ms

dpixel

dpixel

1409 ms

dpixel

dpixel

1601 ms

dpixel

dpixel

1630 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

1553 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

1645 ms

pixel

pixel

918 ms

common.js

common.js

698 ms

util.js

util.js

793 ms

activeview

activeview

664 ms

activeview

activeview

630 ms

pixel

pixel

709 ms

pixel

pixel

292 ms

activeview

activeview

275 ms

pixel

pixel

264 ms

pixel

pixel

136 ms

pixel

pixel

140 ms

pixel

pixel

107 ms

pixel

pixel

112 ms

pixel

pixel

86 ms

pixel

pixel

77 ms

pixel

pixel

77 ms

pixel

pixel

72 ms

pixel

pixel

72 ms

pixel

pixel

72 ms

pixel

pixel

71 ms

pixel

pixel

72 ms

sodar

sodar

45 ms

pixel

pixel

36 ms

pixel

pixel

34 ms

pixel

pixel

31 ms

pixel

pixel

29 ms

pixel

pixel

48 ms

pixel

pixel

38 ms

pixel

pixel

30 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

58 ms

pixel

pixel

19 ms

runner.html

runner.html

10 ms

aframe

aframe

42 ms

SEO Factors

postalcodefinder.co.uk SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Postalcodefinder.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Postalcodefinder.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

postalcodefinder.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Postal Code Finder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: